abdera-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chris Berry <chriswbe...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 0.3 vs. trunk
Date Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:28:00 GMT
I apologize ! You are, of course, correct.
It must have been pilot error on my part.
I went back thru my steps of this AM, and now everything on my side  
builds fine against the branch;  0.3.0-incubating.
(I have so many different versions around that I screwed up...)
Sorry again about the spam.
-- Chris 

On Sep 14, 2007, at 9:46 AM, James M Snell wrote:

> As it stands right now, the only differences between 0.3.0 and the  
> trunk
> are the version numbers, the HttpResponse refactoring on the  
> server, and
> the new Conversion code.  The AbderaClient, most of the server
> refactorings, the spring code, etc are all part of the 0.3.0 branch  
> and
> will ship in 0.3.0.
> - James
> Chris Berry wrote:
>> Greetings,
>> Maybe I missed something along the way?
>> I have been using the SVN trunk to keep up with changes/bug fixes  
>> of late.
>> Sometimes encouraged to do so by this List.
>> At one point, a recent "svn up" required a large scale refactoring  
>> of my
>> code
>> E.g.  CommonsClient is now AbderaClient, new packaging for / 
>> server, etc.
>> Note that the /trunk did NOT change its <version> from
>> 0.3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT
>> So today I grabbed the /branches/0.3-incubating, which frankly I just
>> heard about this week.
>> Perhaps everyone else was aware of this branch? That is entirely  
>> possible.
>> And the branch: /branches/0.3-incubating does NOT contain the recent
>> refactorings.
>> So now I am stuck in the middle.
>> I would love a "stable cut", but I really like the recent  
>> refactorings.
>> The new Spring stuff replaces a lot of code that I was providing.
>> And I know that /trunk will be the spot for active development.
>> And frankly, it took considerable effort to adapt my code to the
>> refactorings
>> So, a few questions;
>> 1) How stable is the current /trunk? I am going to Production soon  
>> with
>> this code...
>> 2) Can we change the /trunk <version> to 0.4.0-incubating- 
>> others do not make this same mistake?
>> 3) Will a stable 0.4.0-incubating follow relatively soon??
>> Thanks much,
>> -- Chris
>> S'all good  ---   chriswberry at gmail dot com

S'all good  ---   chriswberry at gmail dot com

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message