airflow-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bolke de Bruin <bdbr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Airflow 1.9.0 status
Date Wed, 20 Sep 2017 18:10:46 GMT
No vote indeed, just to gather feedback on a particular fixed point in time. It also gives
a bit more trust to a tarball than to a git pull.

Bolke

> On 20 Sep 2017, at 20:09, Chris Riccomini <criccomini@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> I can do a beta. Is the process significantly different? IIRC, it's
> basically the same, just no vote, right?
> 
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Bolke de Bruin <bdbruin@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Are you sure you want to go ahead and do RCs right away? Isn’t a beta a
>> bit smarter?
>> 
>> - Bolke
>> 
>>> On 20 Sep 2017, at 19:41, Chris Riccomini <criccomini@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hey all,
>>> 
>>> I want to send out a warning that I'm planning to cut the stable branch
>>> next week, and begin the RC1 release vote. Once the stable branch is
>> cut, I
>>> will be locking down what commits get cherry picked into the branch, and
>>> will only be doing PRs that are required to get the release out.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Chris
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Chris Riccomini <criccomini@apache.org
>>> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hey all,
>>>> 
>>>> An update on the 1.9.0 release. Here are the outstanding PRs that are
>>>> slated to be included into 1.9.0:
>>>> 
>>>> ISSUE ID     |STATUS    |DESCRIPTION
>>>> AIRFLOW-1617 |Open      |XSS Vulnerability in Variable endpoint
>>>> AIRFLOW-1611 |Open      |Customize logging in Airflow
>>>> AIRFLOW-1605 |Reopened  |Fix log source of local loggers
>>>> AIRFLOW-1604 |Open      |Rename the logger to log
>>>> AIRFLOW-1525 |Open      |Fix minor LICENSE & NOTICE issue
>>>> AIRFLOW-1499 |In Progres|Eliminate duplicate and unneeded code
>>>> AIRFLOW-1198 |Open      |HDFSOperator to operate HDFS
>>>> AIRFLOW-1055 |Open      |airflow/jobs.py:create_dag_run() exception for
>>>> @on
>>>> AIRFLOW-1019 |Open      |active_dagruns shouldn't include paused DAGs
>>>> AIRFLOW-1018 |Open      |Scheduler DAG processes can not log to stdout
>>>> AIRFLOW-1015 |Open      |TreeView displayed over task instances
>>>> AIRFLOW-1013 |Open      |airflow/jobs.py:manage_slas() exception for
>>>> @once
>>>> AIRFLOW-976  |Open      |Mark success running task causes it to fail
>>>> AIRFLOW-914  |Open      |Refactor BackfillJobTest.test_backfill_
>> examples
>>>> to
>>>> AIRFLOW-913  |Open      |Refactor tests.CoreTest.test_scheduler_job to
>>>> real
>>>> AIRFLOW-912  |Open      |Refactor tests and build matrix
>>>> AIRFLOW-888  |Open      |Operators should not push XComs by default
>>>> AIRFLOW-828  |Open      |Add maximum size for XComs
>>>> AIRFLOW-825  |Open      |Add Dataflow semantics
>>>> AIRFLOW-788  |Open      |Context unexpectedly added to hive conf
>>>> 
>>>> I will be locking down what can get cherry-picked into the 1.9.0 branch
>>>> shortly, so if you have something you want in, please set the fix
>> version
>>>> to 1.9.0.
>>>> 
>>>> We (at WePay) have deployed 1.9.0 into our dev cluster, and it has been
>>>> running smoothly for several days.
>>>> 
>>>> ** I could really use help verifying stability. If you run Airflow, it's
>>>> in your best interest to deploy the 1.9.0 test branch somewhere, and
>> verify
>>>> it's working for your workload. **
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Chris
>>>> 
>> 
>> 


Mime
View raw message