airflow-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bolke de Bruin <bdbr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 1.9.0
Date Wed, 13 Sep 2017 08:18:54 GMT
The PR has been merged. I hope you give 1.9.0 a bit of time to settle (Alpha, beta, …) ,
so we can give this logging refactor some love…


> On 11 Sep 2017, at 22:59, Chris Riccomini <criccomini@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> I'm waiting to cut 1.9.0 test until this lands. Can you please post here
> when it is committed?
> 
> On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Bolke de Bruin <bdbruin@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Small update: I expect the logging update to come in either today or
>> tomorrow (Monday). Due to its nature - refactoring all logging - it will be
>> massive. This is unfortunately unavoidable. Still I think it is the right
>> thing to do for 1.9.0 otherwise it needs to wait another major release
>> probably.
>> 
>> Bolke
>> 
>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
>> 
>>> Op 7 sep. 2017 om 21:26 heeft Chris Riccomini <criccomini@apache.org>
>> het volgende geschreven:
>>> 
>>> Double negative for the win. Rephrase: Highly unlikely K8s will make
>> 1.9.0.
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Chris Riccomini <criccomini@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Highly unlikely K8s will not make 1.9.0.
>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Bolke de Bruin <bdbruin@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Depends on how fast it stabilizes...
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 7 Sep 2017, at 21:11, Sergei Iakhnin <llevar@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The Kubernetes features would be exciting to have. Do you think these
>>>>> will
>>>>>> make it into this release?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:22 PM Bolke de Bruin <bdbruin@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Would be appreciated!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Op 7 sep. 2017 8:06 p.m. schreef "Chris Riccomini" <
>>>>> criccomini@apache.org
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> @Bolke, I can wait to cut the test branch until that PR is
merged,
>> if
>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> like.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Bolke de Bruin <bdbruin@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> One of my team members is preparing a comprehensive PR
that reworks
>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>> logging to use the standard framework that was recently
introduced.
>>>>> It
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>> expected to be become public tomorrow. So please don't
cut too
>> early
>>>>>>> ;-).
>>>>>>>>> In addition it would be nice to have a PR clean up? Some
PRs have
>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>> waiting for some time.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> BTW: we will maintain 1.8.X for bug fixes until  1.10/2.0
comes
>>>>> along.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>> Bolke
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On 7 Sep 2017, at 18:55, Chris Riccomini <criccomini@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Hey all,
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> The workflow is documented here:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/
>> Releasing+Airflow
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I'll probably cut the 1.9.0 test branch today or
tomorrow,
>> depending
>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>> schedule. I'll let folks know when it's cut via dev@.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Once the branch is cut does that mean no more
PRs will be
>> included
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> release, or can some changes still be cherry-picked/merged
in?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> We can still cherry-pick PRs in. Very quickly, though,
we begin
>>>>>>>> rejecting
>>>>>>>>>> any PRs that aren't bug fixes. It's a big exercise
to stabilize
>>>>> these
>>>>>>>>>> releases, so I will start rejecting merging non-bug
fix PRs pretty
>>>>>>>>> quickly.
>>>>>>>>>> Probably within a couple of weeks.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>> Chris
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Ash Berlin-Taylor
<
>>>>>>>>>> ash_airflowlist@firemirror.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> What is the workflow? Once the branch is cut
does that mean no
>> more
>>>>>>>> PRs
>>>>>>>>>>> will be included in the release, or can some
changes still be
>>>>>>>>>>> cherry-picked/merged in?
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> (Is this documented somewhere I can read?)
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, and thing someone in gitter chat pointed
out: the CHANGELOG
>> on
>>>>>>>>> master
>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't include entries for 1.8.2.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> -ash
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7 Sep 2017, at 17:28, Andrew Chen <andrewchen@databricks.com
>>> 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Any estimate when branch 1.9 will be cut?
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Maxime Beauchemin
<
>>>>>>>>>>>> maximebeauchemin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Go for it! Still trying to wrap up 1.8.2
...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Max
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Bolke
de Bruin <
>>>>> bdbruin@gmail.com
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Awesome!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7 Sep 2017, at 17:04, Chris
Riccomini <
>>>>> criccomini@apache.org
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I want to get the ball rolling
on 1.9.0, now that 1.8.2 is
>> out
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> door.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Max, I recall you mentioning
driving this, but if you're
>> burnt
>>>>>>>> out
>>>>>>>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the 1.8.2 work, Joy and I can
drive 1.9.0. Just let me know.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sergei
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 


Mime
View raw message