airflow-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chris Riccomini <criccom...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Airflow 1.9.0 status
Date Wed, 20 Sep 2017 18:09:30 GMT
I can do a beta. Is the process significantly different? IIRC, it's
basically the same, just no vote, right?

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Bolke de Bruin <bdbruin@gmail.com> wrote:

> Are you sure you want to go ahead and do RCs right away? Isn’t a beta a
> bit smarter?
>
> - Bolke
>
> > On 20 Sep 2017, at 19:41, Chris Riccomini <criccomini@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I want to send out a warning that I'm planning to cut the stable branch
> > next week, and begin the RC1 release vote. Once the stable branch is
> cut, I
> > will be locking down what commits get cherry picked into the branch, and
> > will only be doing PRs that are required to get the release out.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Chris
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Chris Riccomini <criccomini@apache.org
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hey all,
> >>
> >> An update on the 1.9.0 release. Here are the outstanding PRs that are
> >> slated to be included into 1.9.0:
> >>
> >> ISSUE ID     |STATUS    |DESCRIPTION
> >> AIRFLOW-1617 |Open      |XSS Vulnerability in Variable endpoint
> >> AIRFLOW-1611 |Open      |Customize logging in Airflow
> >> AIRFLOW-1605 |Reopened  |Fix log source of local loggers
> >> AIRFLOW-1604 |Open      |Rename the logger to log
> >> AIRFLOW-1525 |Open      |Fix minor LICENSE & NOTICE issue
> >> AIRFLOW-1499 |In Progres|Eliminate duplicate and unneeded code
> >> AIRFLOW-1198 |Open      |HDFSOperator to operate HDFS
> >> AIRFLOW-1055 |Open      |airflow/jobs.py:create_dag_run() exception for
> >> @on
> >> AIRFLOW-1019 |Open      |active_dagruns shouldn't include paused DAGs
> >> AIRFLOW-1018 |Open      |Scheduler DAG processes can not log to stdout
> >> AIRFLOW-1015 |Open      |TreeView displayed over task instances
> >> AIRFLOW-1013 |Open      |airflow/jobs.py:manage_slas() exception for
> >> @once
> >> AIRFLOW-976  |Open      |Mark success running task causes it to fail
> >> AIRFLOW-914  |Open      |Refactor BackfillJobTest.test_backfill_
> examples
> >> to
> >> AIRFLOW-913  |Open      |Refactor tests.CoreTest.test_scheduler_job to
> >> real
> >> AIRFLOW-912  |Open      |Refactor tests and build matrix
> >> AIRFLOW-888  |Open      |Operators should not push XComs by default
> >> AIRFLOW-828  |Open      |Add maximum size for XComs
> >> AIRFLOW-825  |Open      |Add Dataflow semantics
> >> AIRFLOW-788  |Open      |Context unexpectedly added to hive conf
> >>
> >> I will be locking down what can get cherry-picked into the 1.9.0 branch
> >> shortly, so if you have something you want in, please set the fix
> version
> >> to 1.9.0.
> >>
> >> We (at WePay) have deployed 1.9.0 into our dev cluster, and it has been
> >> running smoothly for several days.
> >>
> >> ** I could really use help verifying stability. If you run Airflow, it's
> >> in your best interest to deploy the 1.9.0 test branch somewhere, and
> verify
> >> it's working for your workload. **
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Chris
> >>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message