airflow-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Imberman <daniel.imber...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 1.9.0
Date Mon, 11 Sep 2017 21:27:49 GMT
@sergey: Chris and Bolke are 100% correct. Still a few major features
needed in k8s. Definitely hoping to have an alpha/beta version for the next
release if all goes well, though :).

On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 2:05 PM Chris Riccomini <criccomini@apache.org>
wrote:

> I'm waiting to cut 1.9.0 test until this lands. Can you please post here
> when it is committed?
>
> On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Bolke de Bruin <bdbruin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Small update: I expect the logging update to come in either today or
> > tomorrow (Monday). Due to its nature - refactoring all logging - it will
> be
> > massive. This is unfortunately unavoidable. Still I think it is the right
> > thing to do for 1.9.0 otherwise it needs to wait another major release
> > probably.
> >
> > Bolke
> >
> > Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
> >
> > > Op 7 sep. 2017 om 21:26 heeft Chris Riccomini <criccomini@apache.org>
> > het volgende geschreven:
> > >
> > > Double negative for the win. Rephrase: Highly unlikely K8s will make
> > 1.9.0.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Chris Riccomini <
> criccomini@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Highly unlikely K8s will not make 1.9.0.
> > >>
> > >>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Bolke de Bruin <bdbruin@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Depends on how fast it stabilizes...
> > >>>
> > >>> Sent from my iPhone
> > >>>
> > >>>> On 7 Sep 2017, at 21:11, Sergei Iakhnin <llevar@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The Kubernetes features would be exciting to have. Do you think
> these
> > >>> will
> > >>>> make it into this release?
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:22 PM Bolke de Bruin <bdbruin@gmail.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Would be appreciated!
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Op 7 sep. 2017 8:06 p.m. schreef "Chris Riccomini" <
> > >>> criccomini@apache.org
> > >>>>>> :
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> @Bolke, I can wait to cut the test branch until that PR
is merged,
> > if
> > >>> you
> > >>>>>> like.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Bolke de Bruin <
> bdbruin@gmail.com>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> One of my team members is preparing a comprehensive
PR that
> reworks
> > >>> all
> > >>>>>>> logging to use the standard framework that was recently
> introduced.
> > >>> It
> > >>>>> is
> > >>>>>>> expected to be become public tomorrow. So please don't
cut too
> > early
> > >>>>> ;-).
> > >>>>>>> In addition it would be nice to have a PR clean up?
Some PRs have
> > >>> been
> > >>>>>>> waiting for some time.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> BTW: we will maintain 1.8.X for bug fixes until  1.10/2.0
comes
> > >>> along.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Cheers
> > >>>>>>> Bolke
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On 7 Sep 2017, at 18:55, Chris Riccomini <criccomini@apache.org
> >
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Hey all,
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> The workflow is documented here:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/
> > Releasing+Airflow
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> I'll probably cut the 1.9.0 test branch today or
tomorrow,
> > depending
> > >>>>> on
> > >>>>>>>> schedule. I'll let folks know when it's cut via
dev@.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Once the branch is cut does that mean no more
PRs will be
> > included
> > >>>>> in
> > >>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>> release, or can some changes still be cherry-picked/merged
in?
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> We can still cherry-pick PRs in. Very quickly,
though, we begin
> > >>>>>> rejecting
> > >>>>>>>> any PRs that aren't bug fixes. It's a big exercise
to stabilize
> > >>> these
> > >>>>>>>> releases, so I will start rejecting merging non-bug
fix PRs
> pretty
> > >>>>>>> quickly.
> > >>>>>>>> Probably within a couple of weeks.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Cheers,
> > >>>>>>>> Chris
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Ash Berlin-Taylor
<
> > >>>>>>>> ash_airflowlist@firemirror.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> What is the workflow? Once the branch is cut
does that mean no
> > more
> > >>>>>> PRs
> > >>>>>>>>> will be included in the release, or can some
changes still be
> > >>>>>>>>> cherry-picked/merged in?
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> (Is this documented somewhere I can read?)
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Oh, and thing someone in gitter chat pointed
out: the CHANGELOG
> > on
> > >>>>>>> master
> > >>>>>>>>> doesn't include entries for 1.8.2.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> -ash
> > >>>>>>>>>> On 7 Sep 2017, at 17:28, Andrew Chen <
> andrewchen@databricks.com
> > >
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Any estimate when branch 1.9 will be cut?
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Maxime
Beauchemin <
> > >>>>>>>>>> maximebeauchemin@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Go for it! Still trying to wrap up
1.8.2 ...
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Max
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Bolke
de Bruin <
> > >>> bdbruin@gmail.com
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Awesome!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7 Sep 2017, at 17:04, Chris
Riccomini <
> > >>> criccomini@apache.org
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey all,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I want to get the ball rolling
on 1.9.0, now that 1.8.2 is
> > out
> > >>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>> door.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> @Max, I recall you mentioning
driving this, but if you're
> > burnt
> > >>>>>> out
> > >>>>>>>>>>> after
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the 1.8.2 work, Joy and I can
drive 1.9.0. Just let me
> know.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Sergei
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message