airflow-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Imberman <daniel.imber...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Airflow + Kubernetes update meeting
Date Thu, 07 Sep 2017 16:50:55 GMT
Morning everyone!

So the meeting is going to start in ~ 15 minutes @ zoom.us/my/sig.big.data.
We'll be using the sig-big-data google doc for notes/minutes (
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pnF38NF6N5eM8DlK088XUW85Vms4V2uTsGZvSp8MNIA/edit#).
Looking forward to seeing everyone there!

Daniel

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:34 PM Daniel Imberman <daniel.imberman@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hey guys!
>
> @Dan & @Chris: Great!
> @Marc: My pleasure :).
>
> So everything is all set for tomorrow at 10AM PST at
> zoom.us/my/sig.big.data. Main points will be to update on the what we've
> been working on and create a final roadmap for merging the PR. Looking
> forward to seeing everyone there!
>
>
> Daniel
>
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 1:12 PM Marc Bollinger <marc@lumoslabs.com> wrote:
>
>> Perfect, thanks so much for your hard work, Daniel!
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Christopher Bockman <
>> chris@fathomhealth.co> wrote:
>>
>>> @Daniel great, thanks!  We'd love to participate--have just started
>>> combining Kubernetes+Airflow and are presumably hitting all of the same
>>> issues everyone else is.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Dan Davydov <dan.davydov@airbnb.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Works for me as well!
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 10:43 AM Daniel Imberman <
>>> daniel.imberman@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> @Marc we will make sure to record the meeting/supply notes. This
>>> should
>>> >> be a pretty straightforward update/overview meeint.
>>> >> @ChrisB this meeting will be a virtual meeting, though Bloomberg is
>>> >> definitely interested in hosting an airflow meetup at our SF location
>>> if
>>> >> there is sufficient interest :).
>>> >> @ChrisR Great to hear :). We've been working with members of the
>>> >> openshift community so we can definitely speak to those requirem
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 10:24 AM Feng Lu <fenglu@google.com.invalid>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> +1, either way works for me.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Chris Riccomini <
>>> criccomini@apache.org>
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> > Works for me.
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Grant Nicholas
>>> <grantnicholas2015@u.
>>> >>> > northwestern.edu> wrote:
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >> +1 for me if it works with others.
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >> On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 11:02 PM, Anirudh Ramanathan <
>>> >>> >> ramanathana@google.com> wrote:
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>> Date/time work for me if we get quorum from this group.
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 7:54 PM, Christopher Bockman
<
>>> >>> >>> chris@fathomhealth.co> wrote:
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>>> Hi Daniel, would this be remote or in person?
>>> >>> >>>>
>>> >>> >>>>
>>> >>> >>>> On Aug 31, 2017 4:16 PM, "Daniel Imberman" <
>>> >>> daniel.imberman@gmail.com>
>>> >>> >>>> wrote:
>>> >>> >>>>
>>> >>> >>>> Hey guys!
>>> >>> >>>>
>>> >>> >>>> So I wanted to set up a meeting to discuss some
of the
>>> >>> updates/current
>>> >>> >>>> work
>>> >>> >>>> that is going on with both the kubernetes operator
and
>>> kubernetes
>>> >>> >>>> executor
>>> >>> >>>> efforts. There has been some really cool updates/proposals
on
>>> the
>>> >>> >>>> design of
>>> >>> >>>> these two features and I would love to get some
community
>>> feedback
>>> >>> to
>>> >>> >>>> make
>>> >>> >>>> sure that we are taking this in a direction that
benefits
>>> everyone.
>>> >>> >>>>
>>> >>> >>>> I am thinking of having this meeting at 10:00AM
on Thursday,
>>> >>> September
>>> >>> >>>> 7th
>>> >>> >>>> PST. Would this time/place work?
>>> >>> >>>>
>>> >>> >>>> Thanks!
>>> >>> >>>>
>>> >>> >>>> Daniel
>>> >>> >>>>
>>> >>> >>>>
>>> >>> >>>>
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>> --
>>> >>> >>> Anirudh Ramanathan
>>> >>> >>>
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >>
>>> >>> >
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>>
>>
>>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message