airflow-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Deng Xiaodong <xd.den...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Move "Who uses Airflow?" (to Ecosystem? or new "users" page)?
Date Tue, 25 Aug 2020 10:04:43 GMT
Personally I think it does not fit the scope of README very well, and does
make the file unnecessarily long.

So I would suggest to move it somewhere else too.


XD


On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:43 Tomasz Urbaszek <turbaszek@apache.org> wrote:

> I agree with Sumit. Regarding opening a PR - Airflow website is also an
>
> open project :)
>
>
>
> Tomek
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:16 AM Sumit Maheshwari <sumeet.manit@gmail.com>
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Not sure, if I've seen such a list with any other open-source project.
> So I
>
> > feel it's a bit awkward to list 100s of different companies and people
>
> > names on the main page of an Apache project.
>
> >
>
> > Hence, +1 from my side to move the list somewhere else.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 1:35 PM Jarek Potiuk <Jarek.Potiuk@polidea.com>
>
> > wrote:
>
> >
>
> > > Yeah - there are some nice properties of that indeed. As I said - no
>
> > strong
>
> > > opinion, but I wonder what others think about it :)
>
> > >
>
> > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 2:03 AM Ry Walker <ry@rywalker.com> wrote:
>
> > >
>
> > > > I do think it’s one of the fun and impressive things about airflow,
> and
>
> > > an
>
> > > > easy first commit that can lead to more.
>
> > > >
>
> > > > As long as it’s near the bottom it’s not doing any harm.
>
> > > >
>
> > > > -Ry
>
> > > >
>
> > > >
>
> > > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 7:55 PM Jarek Potiuk <
> Jarek.Potiuk@polidea.com
>
> > >
>
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > >
>
> > > > > I think README.md for Airflow should contain some most important
>
> > > topics.
>
> > > > I
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > started to wonder if the README file is the best place for the list
>
> > of
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > companies using Airflow?
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > I have no strong opinion either way but it feels a bit awkward to
>
> > keep
>
> > > > such
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > a long list in README (especially that it becomes automatically
> part
>
> > of
>
> > > > the
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > PyPI release docs:  https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow/  ).
> The
>
> > > > > README
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > list predates  https://airflow.apache.org  - and maybe it would be
>
> > > > better
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > to keep the list there?
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > WDYT? Any strong opinions or reasoning why the list should/should
> not
>
> > > be
>
> > > > in
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > the README ?
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > --
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > Jarek Potiuk
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > --
>
> > > > Sent from Gmail Mobile
>
> > > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > --
>
> > >
>
> > > Jarek Potiuk
>
> > > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer
>
> > >
>
> > > M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
>
> > > [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
>
> > >
>
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message