airflow-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jarek Potiuk <Jarek.Pot...@polidea.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.10.12 based on 1.10.12rc1
Date Mon, 17 Aug 2020 11:07:57 GMT
+1 (but).


   - Tested: 2.7, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8 with various combinations of
   postgres/mysql/sqlite/rbac/non-rbac.
   - Verified: RAT check of the sources passes
   - MD5 sums all match.
   - I have one last problem with the signature (but it can be easily
   solved)

The release is signed with 12717556040EEF2EEAF1B9C275FCCD0A25FA0E4B key
which is registered at Apache all right (
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS) but it's the one
here:

-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
pub   rsa2048 2019-08-30 [SC] [expires: 2021-08-29]
      12717556040EEF2EEAF1B9C275FCCD0A25FA0E4B
uid           [ultimate] Kaxil Naik <kaxilnaik@gmail.com>
sig 3        75FCCD0A25FA0E4B 2019-08-30  Kaxil Naik <kaxilnaik@gmail.com>
sub   rsa2048 2019-08-30 [E] [expires: 2021-08-29]
sig          75FCCD0A25FA0E4B 2019-08-30  Kaxil Naik <kaxilnaik@gmail.com>

And I have hard time retrieving it form the MIT keyserver (it has never
been reliably working !). Is there any other keyserver you have your public
key uploaded?
I can recommend this one
http://keys.gnupg.net/

Is it possible that you submit your key there so that I can verify it :) ?

J


On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 12:43 PM Deng Xiaodong <xd.deng.r@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks a lot, Kaxil, for taking care of the release. And thanks to all
> contributors.
>
> +1 from me.
>
> # Environment
> - Run with Docker-compose
> - Python 3.6.10
> - Postgres 12.2
> - LocalExecutor
>
> # What's Tested
> - Run DAGs with CRON schedule and “None” schedule
> - Create users with Viewer or Op roles, and test corresponding accesses.
> - Delete DAGs
> - A few changes that I didn’t have time to validate during 1.10.11 release
> (#8663, #8655, #8742, #8719, etc)
>
> # Minor Issue
> - I notice #8692 (https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8692 <
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8692>, which was marked milestone
> 1.10.11) was not included in either 1.10.11 or 1.10.12rc1. Given it’s a
> very simple change which does not affect/block anything, I would like to
> suggest: if there is rc2 for 1.10.12 later (I do not hope so though), let’s
> include #8692 into 1.10.12; otherwise we can update its milestone to
> 1.10.13.
>
> Thanks again!
>
>
> XD
>
>
> > On 15 Aug 2020, at 11:16 PM, Daniel Imberman <daniel.imberman@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1!
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 15, 2020, 1:38 PM Jarek Potiuk <Jarek.Potiuk@polidea.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Cool! Will take a look tomorrow !
> >>
> >> sob., 15 sie 2020, 19:05 użytkownik Kaxil Naik <kaxilnaik@gmail.com>
> >> napisał:
> >>
> >>> Hello Apache Airflow Community,
> >>>
> >>> This is a call for the vote to release Apache Airflow version 1.10.12.
> >>>
> >>> The release candidate:
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/1.10.12rc1/
> >>>
> >>> *apache-airflow-1.10.12rc1-source.tar.gz* is a source release that
> comes
> >>> with INSTALL instructions.
> >>> *apache-airflow-1.10.12rc1-bin.tar.gz* is the binary Python "sdist"
> >>> snapshot.
> >>> *apache_airflow-1.10.12rc1-py3-none-any.whl* is the binary Python wheel
> >>> snapshot.
> >>>
> >>> Public keys are available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/airflow/KEYS
> >>>
> >>> For convenience, RC is also uploaded on PyPI so you can install it
> using
> >>> *pip install apache-airflow==1.10.12rc1*
> >>>
> >>> The Change Log for the release:
> >>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/1.10.12rc1/CHANGELOG.txt
> >>>
> >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (2020-08-18 17:10 UTC) or
> >> until
> >>> the necessary number
> >>> of votes are reached.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/to?iso=20200818T1810&p0=136&font=cursive
> >>>
> >>> Please vote accordingly:
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 approve
> >>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >>>
> >>> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community
> are
> >>> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> >>>
> >>> Please note that the version number excludes the `rcX` string, so it's
> >> now
> >>> simply 1.10.12. This will allow us to rename the artifact without
> >> modifying
> >>> the artifact checksums when we actually release.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Kaxil Naik
> >>>
> >>
>
>

-- 

Jarek Potiuk
Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer

M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
[image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message