airflow-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gerard Casas Saez <gcasass...@twitter.com.INVALID>
Subject Re: [Discuss] Improving AIP process documentation
Date Fri, 21 Aug 2020 18:11:55 GMT
I do have access, I will add it there once there's consensus (not sure if
we should submit this to vote).
Gerard Casas Saez
Twitter | Cortex | @casassaez <http://twitter.com/casassaez>


On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 12:09 PM Ry Walker <ry@rywalker.com> wrote:

> Proposal looks good to me Gerard - thanks for putting this together!
>
> -Ry
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 1:41 PM Gerard Casas Saez
> <gcasassaez@twitter.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I realized that the AIP process was not super clear at times. I was lucky
> > when I proposed AIP-31 that Dan and Tomek guided me through most of the
> > process themselves, but I realize this may be confusing for new members
> of
> > the community. For that reason and after discussing this with Kamil and
> > Jarek on Slack
> > <
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hJDodc1xl4ixswPzAV4IAQu74sLnOOKjqecPgthLta4/edit?usp=sharing
> > >.
> > I'm proposing to extend the AIP page to include a description of the
> > lifecycle of the AIP.
> >
> > I put a doc together with some of my understanding as a new member and
> how
> > I saw the process for AIP-31. Suggestions are welcome and encouraged!
> >
> >
> > Document proposal:
> >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hJDodc1xl4ixswPzAV4IAQu74sLnOOKjqecPgthLta4/edit?usp=sharing
> > <
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hJDodc1xl4ixswPzAV4IAQu74sLnOOKjqecPgthLta4/edit?usp=sharing
> > >
> >
> > Let me know what you think about this :D
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Gerard Casas Saez
> > Twitter | Cortex | @casassaez <http://twitter.com/casassaez>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message