airflow-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gerard Casas Saez <gcasass...@twitter.com.INVALID>
Subject Re: [Discuss] Improving AIP process documentation
Date Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:47:05 GMT
In that direction, I would prefer having markdown docs and PRs instead
actually, similarly to how github.com/tensorflow/community does it.
Thoughts?

Will do a second pass to the later today :D

Gerard Casas Saez
Twitter | Cortex | @casassaez <http://twitter.com/casassaez>


On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 6:57 AM Ry Walker <ry@rywalker.com> wrote:

> Yeah I’d like for AIPs to be GitHub issues, more likely to get better
> attention since we’re all in GitHub way more than cwiki.
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 4:01 AM Jarek Potiuk <Jarek.Potiuk@polidea.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Looks great Gerard! I think maybe one last pass with Superset's docs.
> >
> >
> >
> > Side comment. I really like that SIP's of superset end up as Github
> Issues.
> >
> > They even have template for it. Maybe we should do the same? Seems that
> we
> >
> > are gravitating towards "Github  heads-on" recently - Github Actions,
> >
> > Github Registry, Github Issues, GitHub Discussions .... I also applied
> for
> >
> > Github CodeSpaces access .
> >
> >
> >
> > J.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 2:27 AM Gerard Casas Saez
> >
> > <gcasassaez@twitter.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Thanks Max for sharing. I will take a look and check what we should
> reuse
> >
> > > from there as well.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > I also took a pass to the comments and edited + accepted suggestions.
> Let
> >
> > > me know:
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hJDodc1xl4ixswPzAV4IAQu74sLnOOKjqecPgthLta4/edit
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Will try to read the document sent by Max tomorrow and add details
> based
> > on
> >
> > > that as needed. If someone wants to do that before tomorrow afternoon,
> >
> > > please let me know!
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Gerard Casas Saez
> >
> > > Twitter | Cortex | @casassaez <http://twitter.com/casassaez>
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 3:53 PM Maxime Beauchemin <
> >
> > > maximebeauchemin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > For reference, here's SIP-0 (Superset Improvement Proposal 0) which
> >
> > > defines
> >
> > > > the SIP process for Apache Superset:
> >
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-superset/issues/5602
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > We also have a GitHub issue template for it:
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-superset/blob/master/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/sip.md
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > and this kanban project to track the status of each SIP:
> >
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-superset/projects/7
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > Max
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 3:38 AM Tomasz Urbaszek <
> turbaszek@apache.org>
> >
> > > > wrote:
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > > Thanks Gerard for this proposal, it looks good! I added few
> >
> > > suggestions.
> >
> > > > >
> >
> > > > > Bests,
> >
> > > > > Tomek
> >
> > > > >
> >
> > > > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 10:49 PM Kaxil Naik <kaxilnaik@gmail.com>
> >
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > > >
> >
> > > > > > Thanks Gerard, added my suggestions.
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 7:17 PM Jarek Potiuk <
> >
> > > Jarek.Potiuk@polidea.com
> >
> > > > >
> >
> > > > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > It's super cool indeed! I already made my suggestions and
> >
> > > comments. I
> >
> > > > > > think
> >
> > > > > > > there is no need to do vote - lazy consensus should be
applied
> in
> >
> > > > this
> >
> > > > > > case
> >
> > > > > > > I think when you think is ready :).
> >
> > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > J.
> >
> > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 8:12 PM Gerard Casas Saez
> >
> > > > > > > <gcasassaez@twitter.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > I do have access, I will add it there once there's
consensus
> > (not
> >
> > > > > sure
> >
> > > > > > if
> >
> > > > > > > > we should submit this to vote).
> >
> > > > > > > > Gerard Casas Saez
> >
> > > > > > > > Twitter | Cortex | @casassaez <http://twitter.com/casassaez>
> >
> > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 12:09 PM Ry Walker <ry@rywalker.com>
> >
> > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > Proposal looks good to me Gerard - thanks for
putting this
> >
> > > > > together!
> >
> > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > -Ry
> >
> > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 1:41 PM Gerard Casas
Saez
> >
> > > > > > > > > <gcasassaez@twitter.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi folks,
> >
> > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > I realized that the AIP process was not
super clear at
> >
> > > times. I
> >
> > > > > was
> >
> > > > > > > > lucky
> >
> > > > > > > > > > when I proposed AIP-31 that Dan and Tomek
guided me
> through
> >
> > > > most
> >
> > > > > of
> >
> > > > > > > the
> >
> > > > > > > > > > process themselves, but I realize this may
be confusing
> for
> >
> > > new
> >
> > > > > > > members
> >
> > > > > > > > > of
> >
> > > > > > > > > > the community. For that reason and after
discussing this
> > with
> >
> > > > > Kamil
> >
> > > > > > > and
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Jarek on Slack
> >
> > > > > > > > > > <
> >
> > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hJDodc1xl4ixswPzAV4IAQu74sLnOOKjqecPgthLta4/edit?usp=sharing
> >
> > > > > > > > > > >.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > I'm proposing to extend the AIP page to
include a
> > description
> >
> > > > of
> >
> > > > > > the
> >
> > > > > > > > > > lifecycle of the AIP.
> >
> > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > I put a doc together with some of my understanding
as a
> new
> >
> > > > > member
> >
> > > > > > > and
> >
> > > > > > > > > how
> >
> > > > > > > > > > I saw the process for AIP-31. Suggestions
are welcome and
> >
> > > > > > encouraged!
> >
> > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Document proposal:
> >
> > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hJDodc1xl4ixswPzAV4IAQu74sLnOOKjqecPgthLta4/edit?usp=sharing
> >
> > > > > > > > > > <
> >
> > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hJDodc1xl4ixswPzAV4IAQu74sLnOOKjqecPgthLta4/edit?usp=sharing
> >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Let me know what you think about this :D
> >
> > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Best,
> >
> > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Gerard Casas Saez
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Twitter | Cortex | @casassaez <
> > http://twitter.com/casassaez>
> >
> > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > --
> >
> > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > Jarek Potiuk
> >
> > > > > > > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software
> Engineer
> >
> > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > > > M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
> >
> > > > > > > [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
> >
> > > > > > >
> >
> > > > > >
> >
> > > > >
> >
> > > >
> >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> >
> > Jarek Potiuk
> >
> > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer
> >
> >
> >
> > M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
> >
> > [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
> >
> > --
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message