ambari-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Yusaku Sako <yus...@hortonworks.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari 0.9-incubating RC0
Date Thu, 05 Jul 2012 22:11:11 GMT
+1.
I was able to build/install the Ambari RPMs and deploy a 10-node RHEL5
cluster without any issues.  I used the tarball from
http://people.apache.org/~vikram/ambari-0.9-incubating-rc0/.

Yusaku

On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Varun Kapoor <reznor@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Nicely done, Vikram!
>
> /V
>
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Matt Foley <mfoley@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Vitthal "Suhas" Gogate <
>> gogate@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>
>> > +1
>> >
>> > Thanks Vikram!
>> >
>> > Sent from my iPhone
>> >
>> > On Jul 4, 2012, at 3:15 PM, Vikram Dixit <vikram@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi All,
>> > >
>> > > I have created a ambari-0.9-incubating-rc0 release candidate. This work
>> > is a complete re-write of the earlier code and warranted a big jump in
>> the
>> > version number. Also, we are close enough to a 1.0 and should be able to
>> > make a 1.0 release soon. However, given that the current trunk is very
>> > usable and supports a number of features, we have the 0.9 as a stable
>> > playing ground before 1.0. The following artifacts up for a vote:
>> > >
>> > > SVN source tag (r1357402)
>> > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ambari/branches/branch-0.9/
>> > >
>> > > Staging site:
>> > > http://people.apache.org/~vikram/ambari-0.9-incubating-rc0/
>> > >
>> > > PGP release keys (signed using 876EF43B)
>> > >
>> >
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ambari/branches/branch-0.9/KEYS
>> > >
>> > > One can look into the issues fixed in this release at
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=12321561
>> > >
>> > > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> > >
>> > > [ ] +1 approve
>> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
>> > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>> > >
>> > > Clearly I am +1.
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Vikram
>> >
>>

Mime
View raw message