ant-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Trevor Harmon <>
Subject Re: Custom processor for Xslt task?
Date Sun, 07 Jan 2007 05:43:17 GMT
On Jan 3, 2007, at 5:16 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote:

> I always used the -lib approach myself,

Yes, that works for me too, but it's exactly what I'm trying to  
avoid! After all, having to specify -lib defeats the purpose of the  
<factory> override.

> and can't easily test this
> nowdays, sorry. It's quite possible there's a classloader issue that
> prevents the Saxon factory to be loaded properly from a jar specified
> in the <xslt>'s nested <classpath>. Just check the obvious, like the
> spelling of the factory class name, the classpath, etc..., just in
> case. Good luck, --DD

It's definitely not a misspelling. The <factory> override workaround  
always results in a ClassNotFoundException.

I've filed a bug on this issue:


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message