aries-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Baptiste Onofré ...@nanthrax.net>
Subject Re: 0.3 release
Date Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:12:40 GMT
[INFO] Apache Aries .......................................... SUCCESS 
[3.954s]
[INFO] 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO] 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 29 minutes 25 seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Wed Jan 19 11:08:09 CET 2011
[INFO] Final Memory: 136M/424M
[INFO] 
------------------------------------------------------------------------


It looks good to me.

I got some warnings in maven bundle plugin around the Private-Package 
instructions usage.
[WARNING] Warning building bundle 
org.apache.aries.samples.blueprint.helloworld:org.apache.aries.samples.blueprint.helloworld.api:bundle:0.3-SNAPSHOT

: Instructions in Private-Package, or -testpackages that are never used: 
org\.apache\.aries\.samples\.blueprint\.helloworld\.api.*\.impl
Classpath: Jar:.

[WARNING] Warning building bundle 
org.apache.aries.samples.blueprint.helloworld:org.apache.aries.samples.blueprint.helloworld.api:bundle:0.3-SNAPSHOT

: Did not find matching referal for org.apache.aries.*


I keep on by testing the built artifacts.

Regards
JB


On 01/19/2011 10:36 AM, zoe slattery wrote:
> On 19/01/2011 09:24, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>> Thanks Zoe,
>>
>> I'm gonna checkout the branch to try a build.
> Good plan - I noticed this warning:
>
> [WARNING] POM for 'biz.aQute:bndlib:pom:1.15.0:runtime' is invalid.
>
> anyone else seen it? I'm not sure if its been there for a while and I
> just haven't noticed or if it's something we should fix.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 01/19/2011 10:18 AM, zoe slattery wrote:
>>> Done, or rather deleted the branch and recreated it. Just checking out
>>> and building now.
>>> Z
>>>> I agree, update the branch to match trunk.
>>>>
>>>> On 18 January 2011 14:23, zoe slattery<zoe.slattery@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> OK - I'm happy with that, let's just give people till tomorrow to
>>>>> object (or
>>>>> not). If there are no objections I'll cut a new branch tomorrow.
>>>>>
>>>>> Z
>>>>>> The branch has been cut more than two weeks ago and I think a
>>>>>> bunch of
>>>>>> fixes
>>>>>> have been committed in trunk recently (even the upgrade to the
>>>>>> released
>>>>>> version of the maven plugin for example).
>>>>>> I'd personally think it would be safer to recut a branch from trunk.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 14:55, Guillaume Nodet<gnodet@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Right, but the later could imply we just recut the branch to
make
>>>>>>> sure we
>>>>>>> include everything.
>>>>>>> Not sure when the current branch has been cut though.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 14:53, zoe
>>>>>>> slattery<zoe.slattery@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LOL - I hoped that was implied, but thanks for spelling it
out
>>>>>>>> Z
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Another question would be to ask if anything in trunk should
not
>>>>>>>> be in
>>>>>>>>> 0.3.0
>>>>>>>>> ? ;-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 14:06, zoe
>>>>>>>>> slattery<zoe.slattery@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So we have the 2.2.0 release of the Maven Bundle Plugin
(thanks
>>>>>>>>> Stuart)
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> I am building and testing the 0.3-RCx branch with
a view to
>>>>>>>>>> creating a
>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>> It's a while since I created this branch and I notice
that some
>>>>>>>>>> commits
>>>>>>>>>> have gone in. Am I right in assuming that everything
that you
>>>>>>>>>> all want
>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>> the release is is the branch? If not, now would be
a good time
>>>>>>>>>> to add
>>>>>>>>>> things
>>>>>>>>>> :-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Zoe
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>>>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message