aries-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alasdair Nottingham <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Roadmap for Apache Aries 1.0
Date Fri, 25 Nov 2011 16:31:17 GMT
Hmm, well I might pick on util first myself, but only because it is at the
bottom of the stack. Blueprint is the bit that has the most work required I
think.

On 25 November 2011 16:19, Graham Charters <gcharters@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 to the criteria and +1 to picking on Blueprint first.
>
> On 25 November 2011 12:31, Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@gmail.com> wrote:
> > As a reference, here are the related code that implement custom
> > NamespaceHandlers:
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/trunk/rt/core/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/bus/blueprint/
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/karaf/trunk/jaas/jasypt/src/main/java/org/apache/karaf/jaas/jasypt/handler/
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/karaf/trunk/shell/console/src/main/java/org/apache/karaf/shell/console/commands/
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/karaf/trunk/jaas/config/src/main/java/org/apache/karaf/jaas/config/impl/
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/trunk/components/camel-blueprint/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/blueprint/handler/
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/trunk/xbean-blueprint/src/main/java/org/apache/xbean/blueprint/cm/
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/trunk/xbean-blueprint/src/main/java/org/apache/xbean/blueprint/context/impl/
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 13:17, Alasdair Nottingham <not@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I would like to propose we come up with a road map for getting the
> bundles
> >> in aries up to the 1.0.0 release. Some things I think we need to do are:
> >>
> >>   1. Ensure we comply with relevant OSGi CTs
> >>   2. Ensure we do semantic versioning
> >>   3. Ensure we have a well defined API for extending and reusing
> blueprint
> >>   such that our internals are not exposed and we can ensure we don't
> break
> >>   CXF, XBeans-Blueprint, Karaf et al
> >>
> >> Based on the discussions over the last few weeks I would like to
> suggest we
> >> have a discussion about what is needed by extenders of blueprint. While
> >> those working on CXF, XBeans-blueprint Karaf etc all know how they are
> >> using blueprint that information is not known to the whole aries
> community
> >> causing may issues. We can then move to having an API we can keep
> stable,
> >> and internals we can break.
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >> Alasdair
> >>
> >> --
> >> Alasdair Nottingham
> >> not@apache.org
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ------------------------
> > Guillaume Nodet
> > ------------------------
> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> > ------------------------
> > Open Source SOA
> > http://fusesource.com
>



-- 
Alasdair Nottingham
not@apache.org

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message