aries-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Carsten Ziegeler <cziege...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Running Subsystems without Blueprint?
Date Fri, 17 Jan 2014 16:58:34 GMT
Great :)

I've created a first one:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1149

If this goes well, I'll tackle the other one :)

Regards
Carsten


2014/1/17 David Bosschaert <david.bosschaert@gmail.com>

> Hi Carsten,
>
> I think that makes sense. Whether you use Blueprint, DS, OSGi/CDI or
> whatever else as a component framework is a little bit a matter of
> taste. I agree that it would be good to decouple the subsystems
> implementation from the component framework so that people can make
> that choice independently...
>
> I'm sure that if you provide patches they will be looked at :)
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
> On 17 January 2014 16:39, Carsten Ziegeler <cziegeler@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > we would like to run the subsystems implementation without Blueprint.
> It's
> > not a matter whether Blueprint is good or not and I don't want to start a
> > thread about that :). The main reason are a) we want to have Subsystems
> > running as soon as possible and with as less dependencies as possible b)
> we
> > can't ship Blueprint with our products (and again this decision is not
> > caused by technical reasons)
> >
> > Now if I look correctly, the only bundles requiring Blueprint are the
> > application.utils and application.modeller. Naive looking it should be
> > straight forward to migrate these to use an Activator and register the
> > services by hand.
> >
> > My question is now, if I would provide the patches, is there interest in
> > applying them?
> >
> > Regards
> > Carsten
> > --
> > Carsten Ziegeler
> > cziegeler@apache.org
>



-- 
Carsten Ziegeler
cziegeler@apache.org

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message