aries-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Baptiste Onofré ...@nanthrax.net>
Subject Re: [Discuss] Chronicle Queue transport for Aries rsa (licensing)
Date Sat, 26 Mar 2016 06:52:15 GMT
Hi David,

I wasn't clear: I don't mind about the dual license, I mind about the 
current Apache license terms ;)

I would prefer a complete Apache license switch without any condition.

Regards
JB

On 03/25/2016 09:31 PM, David Bosschaert wrote:
> On 25 March 2016 at 08:07, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> it's what I said in my other e-mail: we should wait that Chronicle fully
>> switches to Apache (and not dual license).
>>
>
> Dual-license is generally not a problem, I think. If a project is
> dual-licensed, for example being both LGPL and ASL licensed (without any
> further restrictions) then it is fully ASL licensed. AFAIK this is fine.
>
> The thing that is not fine is when they say it's ASL licensed but only
> under certain conditions...
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>

-- 
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Mime
View raw message