aries-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From John Ross <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Aries Transaction Control 0.0.1 (first release)
Date Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:36:20 GMT
I'm not able to run the verify script against your repository [1].

When I go to in
my browser, it says "Repository "orgapachearies-1072 (staging: open)"
[id=orgapachearies-1072] exists but is not exposed."

I believe this means you need to close the staging repository.

--2016-06-17 11:25:54--
Connecting to||:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 302 Found
--2016-06-17 11:25:56--
Connecting to||:443... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
2016-06-17 11:25:56 ERROR 404: Not Found.

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 6:20 AM, Timothy Ward <>

> Hi all,
> As I’m sure you’ve seen from list traffic over the last few months I’ve
> been working on an implementation of OSGi RFC 221 in Aries. The project
> provides implementations of both local and XA transactions, as well as
> resource providers for JDBC and JPA. The latter resource provider makes use
> of the Aries JPA container 2.4.0 release.
> There has been quite a bit of user interest in the project, and there is
> even an OSGi enRoute example being developed using Aries Transaction
> Control. Because of this It feels to be the right time for a 0.0.1 release.
> This will let people kick the tyres a little harder, and hopefully provide
> a good point for collecting further user feedback.
> Obviously the OSGi API being implemented by these components is not final.
> To ensure that this doesn’t case a problem I have done two things. Firstly,
> the projects are being released at a 0.0.x version, secondly, the OSGi API
> packages are being exported with a mandatory attribute of
> api.status=aries.prerelease. This forces users to opt-in to using the API.
> Obviously the attribute will be removed once the OSGi API is finalised.
> I’ve staged a repository at
> The main source release is available at
> Please review the artifacts and vote:
>  [ ] +1 Release the above artifacts
>  [ ] -1 Do not
> As a PMC member I vote +1
> Best Regards,
> Tim

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message