asterixdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike Carey <dtab...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Website
Date Sun, 03 May 2015 21:34:12 GMT
+1 for a specific one....

On 5/3/15 1:08 PM, Till Westmann wrote:
> When using gitpubsub one can either use an existing git repository or have a specific
one just for the site.
>
> Right now it seems to me that it would be better to have a specific repository as
> a) it avoids checking build artifacts into the source repository and
> b) it’s a little cleaner than putting the site into either the asterixdb or the hyracks
repo.
>
> Thoughts? Other opinions?
>
> Thanks,
> Till
>
>> On May 3, 2015, at 9:13 AM, Till Westmann <tillw@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, thanks!
>>
>> I didn't know we could but after your mail I found humbedooh's blog post [1].
>> That seems to be the better way.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Till
>>
>> [1] https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/git_based_websites_available
>>
>>> On May 3, 2015, at 07:41, Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedmann@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Seeing as the project is using Git for source code, I'd suggest trying
>>> gitpubsub instead.
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Till Westmann <tillw@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> now that the code is imported, we should be able to build and deploy a site.
>>>> I’ve created a request [1] to create an SVN repository, so that we can
deploy the site via svnpubsub.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Till
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9579
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Any world that can produce the Taj Mahal, William Shakespeare,
>>> and Stripe toothpaste can't be all bad. (C.R. MacNamara, One Two Three)


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message