asterixdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chen Luo <>
Subject Re: Current Default Log Buffer Size is Too Small
Date Fri, 30 Mar 2018 22:22:49 GMT
An update on this issue. It seems this speed-up comes from simply
increasing the log page size (and I've submitted a patch

I also wrote a simple program to test the write throughput w.r.t. different
page sizes:

       for (int i = 0; i < numPages; i++) {


                while (byteBuffer.hasRemaining()) {

                    totalBytesWriten += channel.write(byteBuffer);





It also confirms that varying page size can have a big impact on the disk
throughput (even it's sequential I/Os). The experiment result on one of our
sensorium node is as follows:

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 5:19 PM, Chen Luo <> wrote:

> Hi Devs,
> Recently I was doing ingestion experiments, and found out our default log
> buffer size (1MB = 8 pages * 128KB page size) is too small, and negatively
> impacts the ingestion performance. The short conclusion is that by simply
> increasing the log buffer size (e.g., to 32MB), I can improve the ingestion
> performance by *50% ~ 100%* on a single node sensorium machine as shown
> follows.
> The detailed explanation of log buffer size is as follows. Right now we
> have a background LogFlusher thread which continuously forces log records
> to disk. When the log buffer is full, writers are blocked to wait for log
> buffer space. However, when setting the log buffer size, we have to
> consider the LSM operations as well. The memory component is first filled
> up with incoming records at a very high speed, which is then flushed to
> disk at a relatively low speed. If the log buffer size is small, ingestion
> is very likely to be blocked by the LogFlusher when filling up the memory
> component. This blocking is wasted since quite often flush/merge is idle.
> However, when the log buffer is relatively large, the LogFlush can catch up
> itself when ingestion is blocked by flush/merge, which is not harmful since
> there is ongoing LSM I/O operations.
> I didn't know how large the log buffer size should be right now (as it
> depends on various factors), but our default value *1MB* is very likely
> too small to cause blocking during normal ingestion time. Just let you know
> and be aware of this parameter when you measure ingestion performance...
> Best regards,
> Chen Luo

  • Unnamed multipart/related (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message