atlas-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David Radley (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (ATLAS-1836) Area 0 of the open metadata model
Date Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:14:00 GMT


David Radley commented on ATLAS-1836:

[~mandy_chessell] I am looking at Locations and notice the nestedLocations. It seems that
we should have this is a containment relationship. I suspect with physical locations - this
could be composition, with a single parent location. I suspect in other cases Aggregation
might be more flexible. 

At the moment I am thinking we should at least use aggregation and many to many. I am thinking
we should special case physical location and have a composition hierarchy (though disputed
territories might not fit here) - I could see this as being more intuitive than a many to
many aggregation? 


> Area 0 of the open metadata model
> ---------------------------------
>                 Key: ATLAS-1836
>                 URL:
>             Project: Atlas
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components:  atlas-core
>            Reporter: Mandy Chessell
>            Assignee: Mandy Chessell
>              Labels: OpenMetadata, VirtualDataConnector
>         Attachments: 0005LinkedMediaTypes.json
> This task delivers the JSON files for the new models that describe types for Area 0 in
the open metadata model.  This area covers base types.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message