axis-java-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Glen Daniels" <gdani...@macromedia.com>
Subject Re: Names
Date Fri, 03 Aug 2001 13:11:33 GMT
+1

----- Original Message -----
From: "Russell Butek" <butek@us.ibm.com>
To: <axis-dev@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 8:07 AM
Subject: Re: Names


> Just my 2 nearly worthless cents.  I would much rather you didn't prefix
> all names with "Axis".  It's redundant.
>
> I've programmed to plenty of frameworks that had classes like
> com.company.product.ProductThis and com.company.product.ProductThat and it
> was just a nuisance to have to type those few unnecessary letters over and
> over.  Keeping the class names simple doesn't cause conflicts.  At most it
> might cause a bit of confusion.  But I always explicitly list classes in
my
> import statements (I despise "import com.company.product.*") so if I don't
> remember where a class comes from, all it takes is a simple quick glance
at
> the imports list to find out.  And if there are two classes with the same
> name in any given implementation, then they both must be fully qualified;
> no confusion there.
>
> Russell Butek
> butek@us.ibm.com
>
>
> Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS on 08/02/2001 11:56:01 AM
>
> Please respond to axis-dev@xml.apache.org
>
> To:   axis-dev@xml.apache.org
> cc:
> Subject:  Names
>
>
>
> One thing to think about doing (after the alpha) is going through
> and renaming the classes that we plan to expose to handler
> writers so they start with "Axis".  Names like "Message" are a bit
> too common and will probably cause annoying conflicts for
> people.
> -Dug
>
>
>


Mime
View raw message