axis-java-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Glen Daniels <gdani...@macromedia.com>
Subject RE: test/wsdl
Date Fri, 04 Jan 2002 15:53:14 GMT

+1, though I think if we generate into a potentially confusing place we should make sure to
note that in a README in the test directory.

--G

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russell Butek [mailto:butek@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 10:23 AM
> To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org
> Subject: RE: test/wsdl
> 
> 
> I mostly agree with Rich, in general it's more sane to keep 
> the relative
> directories the same.  A caveat with Comprehensive.wsdl, though.  I
> intentionally put its generated files in different 
> directories than the
> source directory just so we cover that scenario.  If, by some fluke, a
> future change broke this feature, I'd really like to know about it.
> 
> Russell Butek
> butek@us.ibm.com
> 
> 
> R J Scheuerle Jr/Austin/IBM@IBMUS on 01/04/2002 09:06:10 AM
> 
> Please respond to axis-dev@xml.apache.org
> 
> To:   axis-dev@xml.apache.org
> cc:
> Subject:  RE: test/wsdl
> 
> 
> 
> I will go ahead and move the tests that I added (arrays, sequence,
> multiref, refattr) to test/wsdl.
> 
> I have a couple of questions.
> 
> 1) Should the package names for these wsdl tests be changed.
>      For example, the package for the refattr test is "test.refattr",
> should it be changed to "test.wsdl.refattr".
> 
> 2) Should all the wsdl tests have package names that start 
> with "test.wsdl"
> ?
>      Right now test/wsdl/types/Comprehensive.wsdl generates 
> packages names
> of types.comprehensive, which
>      makes it difficult to find the files in the build tree since the
> directory structure is different.
> 
> +1 to both of the above so that it is easy to associate tests 
> with their
> corresponding classes/files in the build tree.
> 
> Rich Scheuerle
> XML & Web Services Development
> 512-838-5115  (IBM TL 678-5115)
> 
> 
> 
>                     Tom Jordahl
>                     <tomj@macromed       To:
> "'axis-dev@xml.apache.org'" <axis-dev@xml.apache.org>
>                     ia.com>              cc:
>                                          Subject:     RE: test/wsdl
>                     01/03/2002
>                     04:08 PM
>                     Please respond
>                     to axis-dev
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I can move the Fault test.
> I forgot it was down there (under faults, go figure!)
> 
> --
> Tom Jordahl
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glen Daniels [mailto:gdaniels@macromedia.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 3:59 PM
> To: 'axis-dev@xml.apache.org'
> Subject: test/wsdl
> 
> 
> 
> Hi all!
> 
> As per the thread at [1], I think we agreed to move all tests which
> actually generate proxies into test/wsdl.  At present there 
> are still a few
> tests outside of that dir which do proxy generation - these include
> test/faults/FaultServiceTestCase and 
> test/refaddr/RefTestServiceTestCase.
> Can we decide what to do with these?  As I see it the choices 
> are twofold:
> 
> 1) Generate the stubs and check them into CVS, so we don't do 
> it on each
> run
> 
> 2) Move the tests in question under test/wsdl
> 
> Opinions?
> 
> --Glen
> 
> [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=axis-dev&m=100801575732049&w=2
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message