Tom,
that would go hand in hand with JAX-RPC 1.1 spec compliance. Do we have the cycles to implement
JAX-RPC 1.1 and WS-I BP 1.0? (Do you have a few hours to research what exactly we'd need to
do?)
Thanks,
dims
--- Tom Jordahl <tomj@macromedia.com> wrote:
>
> In talking with folks around here, we would be in favor of delaying the 1.2
> release until we can claim WS-I Basic Profile 1.0 conformance. Macromedia
> would be willing to help out with testing resources for this effort.
>
> It will be late January before there are resources here to run the TCK, and
> we would very much like to get BP 1.0 as a feature of the 1.2 release.
>
> The question I was asked is "What does 1.2 give me?" "Bug fixes" wasn't
> thought to be very compelling, while "WS-I BP 1.0 conformance" is something
> that gets a much better reaction.
>
> What do you think?
>
> --
> Tom Jordahl
> Macromedia Server Development
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Jordahl [mailto:tomj@macromedia.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:28 AM
> To: 'axis-dev@ws.apache.org'
> Subject: Moving toward Axis 1.2 beta and release
>
>
> Here is a proposal (discussed with Dims) about how Axis 1.2 should proceed
> to move toward a 1.2 release.
>
> - Create Axis 1.2 beta in the next 3 weeks
> - After beta, run the JAX-RPC/SAAJ TCK 1.1 and resolve failures
> - After we pass the TCK, we release 1.2
>
> I am trying to get commitments from our teams here to run our JRun and
> ColdFusion regressions on the current 1.2 bits. And I will attempt to get
> resources to execute the TCKs (on JRun) here as well.
>
> Comments?
>
> Can anyone else run the TCK at their organization?
>
> --
> Tom Jordahl
> Macromedia Server Development
=====
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
|