axis-java-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ias" <iasan...@tmax.co.kr>
Subject RE: Moving toward Axis 1.2 beta and release
Date Sat, 10 Jan 2004 07:33:58 GMT
Done!

Thanks all who encouraged me :-)

Ias

=========================================================
Lee, Changshin (Korean name)
Ias (International name)
               Company Web Site: http://www.tmax.co.kr
               Personal Web Site: http://www.iasandcb.pe.kr
---------------------------------------------------------
JSR 201, JSR 204 and JSR 222 EG member
Apache Axis (JAX-RPC and SAAJ) and JaxMe (JAXB) committer
R&D Institute
Tmax Soft, Inc.
========================================================= 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Jordahl [mailto:tomj@macromedia.com] 
> Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 12:09 AM
> To: 'axis-dev@ws.apache.org'
> Subject: RE: Moving toward Axis 1.2 beta and release
> 
> +1
> Sounds like the right thing.
> 
> --
> Tom Jordahl
> Macromedia Server Development
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ias [mailto:iasandcb@tmax.co.kr]
> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 1:24 AM
> To: 'Tom Jordahl'; axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Moving toward Axis 1.2 beta and release
> 
> > Ias,
> > 
> > Are you going to make this change for 1.2?
> I thought I'd already done that, but it was my mistake 
> because my Eclipse has not overwritten but kept the change in 
> my local workspace of Axis with each update I made so far 
> from CVS. I can commit right now (definitely for 1.2), and do 
> you have any opinion on that? I'll appeciate it.
> 
> Thanks for your attention,
> 
> Ias
> 
> > 
> > --
> > Tom Jordahl
> > Macromedia Server Development
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ias [mailto:iasandcb@tmax.co.kr]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:47 PM
> > To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: Moving toward Axis 1.2 beta and release
> > 
> > > The question I was asked is "What does 1.2 give me?"  "Bug fixes" 
> > > wasn't thought to be very compelling, while "WS-I BP 1.0
> > conformance" 
> > > is something that gets a much better reaction.
> > > 
> > 
> > Thanks for reminding me of WS-I BP stuffs for Axis. I have 
> one thing 
> > to do with R2707 of WS-I BP 1.0 as follows.
> > 
> > http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/Basic/2003-08/BasicProfile-
> > 1.0a.htm#refinement35158400
> > 
> > 5.6.5 Default for use Attribute
> > There is an inconsistency between the WSDL 1.1 
> specification and the 
> > WSDL 1.
> > 1 schema regarding whether the use attribute is optional on 
> > soapbind:body, soapbind:header, and soapbind:headerfault, 
> and if so, 
> > what omitting the attribute means.
> > 
> > R2707 A wsdl:binding in a DESCRIPTION that contains one or more 
> > soapbind:body, soapbind:fault, soapbind:header or 
> soapbind:headerfault 
> > elements that do not specify the use attribute MUST be 
> interpreted as 
> > though the value "literal"
> > had been specified in each case. 
> > 
> > In order for Axis to support this requirement, we need to modify
> > SymbolTable.setBodyType:
> > 
> >     private void setBodyType(
> >             String use, BindingEntry bEntry, Operation operation, 
> > boolean
> > input)
> >             throws IOException {
> > 
> >         if (use == null) {
> >             throw new IOException(Messages.getMessage("noUse",
> >                     operation.getName()));
> >         }
> > ->
> > 
> >         if (use == null) {
> >           // WS-I BP 1.0 R2707
> >           use = "literal";
> >         }
> > 
> > I'll commit the fix soon. Your comments are always welcome. 
> > 
> > Ias
> > 
> 


Mime
View raw message