From axis-dev-return-29322-apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive=ws.apache.org@ws.apache.org Wed Sep 01 08:51:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 14062 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2004 08:51:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Sep 2004 08:51:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 70915 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2004 08:50:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 70785 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2004 08:50:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-dev@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 70738 invoked by uid 99); 1 Sep 2004 08:50:42 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [156.153.255.245] (HELO palrel10.hp.com) (156.153.255.245) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 01:50:40 -0700 Received: from hplns3.hpl.hp.com (hplns3.hpl.hp.com [15.0.48.4]) by palrel10.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A324D691 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 01:50:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [15.144.25.135] (chamonix.hpl.hp.com [15.144.25.135]) by hplns3.hpl.hp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/HPL-PA Hub) with ESMTP id i818oWT1003319 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 01:50:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <41358D58.1080702@apache.org> Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 09:50:32 +0100 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (X11/20040615) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: server redirected too many times(20) while using AXIS 1.1 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Satish Artham wrote: > If you're implying that 1.2 beta is more stable than 1.1 then I will use > the beta version. It is more stable than 1.1 . It has all the bugfixes found against 1.1. There may be regressions, but if you find them, now is the time to do so. Better than to wait till it gets declared the 1.2 release and then we find the defects. The process I use is 1. I download from CVS axis and build it myself. 2. I import the built files into my projects through an explicit task: This copies files that have different content. 3. the copied files are stored in SCM, so that we can roll back to the version, and so other people (and cruise control) does not need the axis source. 4. I usually update axis every week, unless I am making changes to axis itself. It works pretty well. Having a weekly update reduces the need to test for regressions so early, but still keeps me up to date. And having everything on SCM lets me roll back. -steve