axis-java-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sanka Samaranayake <ssa...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Axis2] services.wom
Date Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:26:18 GMT
Hello everyone,

Pardon me if I am wrong, but aren't we suppose to get rid of WOM and
use wooden as it becomes available? Therefore is it worth to put a lot
of effort to make WOM to hold any information as the central
representation of AxisService?

Sanka.

On 1/10/06, Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ajith,
>
> it's not just serialization....I think of it as one central
> representation of an axis service. whether it is on disk or in memory.
> Annotations in code will affect it, entries in services.xml may affect
> it, runtime reflection may affect it. But at any given point after
> taking into account the original wsdl, annotations, runtime
> reflection, services.xml etc....the final product is the wom which is
> the Axis Service that the developer wants to expose to the world.
> Whether it is on disk or in memory...it should not matter. Basically
> we should be able to generate xsd's or wsdl11's or wsdl12 or SSDL or
> any other acronym thrown at us
> (http://hinchcliffe.org/archive/2005/05/16/231.aspx)
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> On 1/9/06, Ajith Ranabahu <ajith.ranabahu@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >  Dims has a point, in the sense that WOM represents both the WSDL versions
> > and a serialization of one version may not be a complete representation of
> > the other. However I feel that it'll be an over engineering as far as WOM is
> > considered. I mean if you want to serialize it go do it as either a WSDL1.1
> > or WSDL2.0 document.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 1/9/06, Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Eran,
> > >
> > > If that's what you prefer, then sure...but remember we can't read it
> > > then. On a related note, AxisServiceBuilder should *NOT* be working
> > > with WSDL4J classes. getAxisService should operate on a wom.
> > >
> > > -- dims
> > >
> > > On 1/9/06, Eran Chinthaka <chinthaka@opensource.lk> wrote:
> > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > > Hash: SHA1
> > > >
> > > > Isn't it the WSDL2Writer you are talking about ? I think WOM model is
> > > > completely WSDL2 and saving WOM means its saving a WSDL 2.0 document.
> > > >
> > > > Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > How about we have an xml format for wom itself? that is neither
> > > > > wsdl11 or wsdl12? Am bringing this up to figure how how we should
> > > > > fix AXIS2-365. Specifically the comment from Sanjiva here:
> > > > >
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=axis-dev&m=113679084111960&w=2
> > > > >
> > > > > The idea is to store it a neutral format (neither wsdl11 or wsdl12)
> > > > > and at runtime generate whichever version of wsdl is needed.
> > > > >
> > > > > What do you think?
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks, dims
> > > > >
> > > > > -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
> > > > >
> > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
> > > >
> > > >
> > iD8DBQFDwoIxjON2uBzUhh8RAldXAJ9L8aAZBA/wsx797SHBp3n0C2SxUgCggHBC
> > > > jGfuyE5Y9cvgT0edq+UuLu0=
> > > > =nCnr
> > > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ajith Ranabahu
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
>

Mime
View raw message