axis-java-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Amila Suriarachchi <>
Subject Re: Non blocking with two channel is broken
Date Thu, 04 Aug 2011 09:36:51 GMT
Do you mean this code

if (messageCtx.isPropertyTrue(DO_ASYNC)
                || ((messageCtx.getParameter(DO_ASYNC) != null) &&

JavaUtils.isTrueExplicitly(messageCtx.getParameter(DO_ASYNC).getValue()))) {

            String mep = messageCtx.getAxisOperation()
            EndpointReference replyTo = messageCtx.getReplyTo();
            // In order to invoke the service in the ASYNC mode, the request
            // should contain ReplyTo header if the MEP of the service is
            // InOnly type
            if ((!WSDLUtil.isOutputPresentForMEP(mep))
                    || (replyTo != null && !replyTo.hasAnonymousAddress()))
                AsyncMessageReceiverWorker worker = new


It is there in the trunk.

you need to use the  public static final String DO_ASYNC =
"messageReceiver.invokeOnSeparateThread"; at the server side.


On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Deepal jayasinghe <> wrote:

>  Guys,
> A user called "Todd" recently observed [1] that we have issues with
> non-blocking invocation with two channels. I went and tested it and I was
> able to re-create the issue. While debugging the code I realized that
> something has gone wrong. IIRC for the server side we had a check for
> replyTo header and if the replyTo is not Anonymous then we send the ACK
> through the back channel. And once the invocation is complete we send the
> reply through the replyTo address. However, while debugging the code I
> realized that someone has removed those code, so now the logic does not
> work.
> Since I went through the code after long time and not fully updated with
> the source code, I could not able to find the exact location of the code.
> So, if anyone of you have removed the code please let us know, then we can
> fix it correctly. Else I have to fix it on the AbstractMessageReceiver.
> Thanks,
> Deepal
> [1]<>

Amila Suriarachchi
WSO2 Inc.

View raw message