beehive-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kenneth Tam <kentamina...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: wsm -- revisiting the previous discussion
Date Thu, 06 Oct 2005 20:58:43 GMT
+1

I took a look at the work that Eddie's done in his sandbox, and from
an architectural perspective I concur with the approach it takes vs.
the current structure.

On 10/5/05, Rich Feit <richfeit@gmail.com> wrote:
> No dissent from me (much assent in fact :) ).  This sounds great.  If
> there's anything I can do to help in the Mirror layer (where I'd be most
> useful here), let me know -- I'd be happy to pitch in.
>
> Rich
>
> Eddie O'Neil wrote:
>
> >All--
> >
> >  Now that 1.0 is out the door, it seems like it's time to put some
> >effort into updating WSM and getting to passing the TCK.  We discussed
> >this a while back in terms:
> >
> >- changing the annotation processor to use Mirror types and to allow
> >for a Mirror and reflection abstraction
> >- architectural fixup that would more easily facilitate additional
> >features like JAX-RPC code generation
> >- removing the .ser files so that we don't require serialized Java
> >objects at runtime and switching this onto an XML file to describe the
> >relevant web service metadata
> >
> >I've got a large amount of this work sitting in my sandbox and would
> >like to look at bringing it over to trunk/.  Any dissent to this work
> >starting?
> >
> >  Certainly would welcome any help with this...
> >
> >Eddie
> >
> >
> >
>

Mime
View raw message