beehive-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Eddie O'Neil" <ekon...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: wsm breakout progress -- [was: Re: [proposal] wsm breakout]
Date Tue, 30 May 2006 16:19:51 GMT
  :)  I don't mind the WSM dependency at all -- we just need to figure
out a rational way for WSM to be provided to the WSC tests.  Having it
checked in isn't terrible, but that's so 2001.  Using Maven to
distribute it would be much cleaner.

  All in due time...

Eddie



On 5/30/06, Chad Schoettger <chad.schoettger@gmail.com> wrote:
> Good point, I have been trying to decide what the best direction for
> the WSC drts might be (WSM dependency and/or Axis dependency).  I was
> thinking that the WSC drts didn't add a lot of value to WSM testing
> since typically they are exercising web service features provided by
> the underlying service provider.  However they are a good sanity check
> for WSM and do gain a measure of portablilty from the WSM dependency.
>
> If you don't mind the dependency on WSM then I am fine with leaving
> the WSC drts as they are.
>
>    - Chad
>
>
> On 5/30/06, Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 5/30/06, Chad Schoettger <chad.schoettger@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I had been thinking of updating the WSC drts to run against just AXIS
> > > instead of WSM, perhaps this wouldn't be a bad time for it once you
> > > get these changes commited.
> >
> >   Would it be better to leave the web services for WSC testing
> > authored with JSR-181?  It provides an additional set of tests for WSM
> > and gives the test suite (presumed) portability between web service
> > stacks if that was needed.
> >
> >   Thoughts?
> >
> > Eddie
> >
>

Mime
View raw message