beehive-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chad Schoettger" <chad.schoett...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [proposal] wsm breakout
Date Wed, 24 May 2006 14:55:06 GMT
+1

On 5/24/06, Steven Tocco <stocco@bea.com> wrote:
>
> +1 from me, sounds like a great idea.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eddie O'Neil [mailto:ekoneil@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 7:48 AM
> To: Beehive Developers
> Subject: Re: [proposal] wsm breakout
>
>   Excellent -- good to see that there's general support for this.  So
> far, I count:
>
> +1: 4 binding, 3 non-binding
>
> and no other votes.  I don't expect to start on any of this until the
> weekend -- if there are any other opinions, there are a few days left
> to squawk.  :)
>
> Eddie
>
>
>
> On 5/23/06, Steve Hanson <stevelukehanson@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On 5/23/06, Carlin Rogers <carlin.rogers@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On 5/23/06, Rich Feit <richfeit@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Daryl Olander wrote:
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/23/06, Thomas Cook <thomas.cook@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Sounds like a good move.  I'm for it.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On 5/23/06, Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >> > Awesome! +1 from me. We could then use/ship WSM jars as
part
> of
> > > Axis2
> > > > >> > for JSR 181 support (with some additional glue code on the
> Axis2
> > > > >> > side).
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > -- dims
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On 5/23/06, Eddie O'Neil <ekoneil@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >> > > All--
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >   I'd like to propose that the WSM sub-directory in
> beehive/trunk
> > > > be
> > > > >> > > converted into a sub-project of Beehive.  This makes
it
> > > > >> significantly
> > > > >> > > easier to ship WSM independently of the rest of Beehive
as
> it
> > > > >> would be
> > > > >> > > self-contained and wrapped in its own packaging.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >   The motivation for this is a desire to make Beehive
less
> > > > >> monolithic
> > > > >> > > in structure so that separable parts like WSM can evolve
> without
> > > > >> being
> > > > >> > > tied to the other pieces and to deliver on the obvious
> interest
> > > in
> > > > >> > > JSR-181 in this TSS thread:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=40280
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > The next step would be to release a real beta of WSM
before
> the
> > > TCK
> > > > >> work starts.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >   Thoughts / comments / flames?
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Eddie
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > --
> > > > >> > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
> information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
> entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
> or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
> and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
> by email and then delete it.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message