bloodhound-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Martin <>
Subject new KEYS scheme? (Was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.4 (incubating))
Date Tue, 15 Jan 2013 10:29:29 GMT
On 15/01/13 06:22, Ryan Ollos wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Branko ─îibej <> wrote:
>> +1
> Can I count you as a binding vote?
>> Very nice. I see you remove trac/contrib when creating the tarball,
>> which is good. Installed in 5 minutes on my Mac, too.
>> Only one nit: the release manager's PGP key is not in KEYS. Ryan, you
>> should add it; as far as I'm concerned it's OK to just fix the KEYS file
>> in the dist tree, since that won't be changing the packages or checksums
>> in any way.
> Thanks, I will add my key. Gary had mentioned this might be needed. I'll
> also add a note to the Release Process wiki page about this.

Yeah, I vaguely remembered something about a new way of listing the 
keys. Presumably, that is something to do with what this file:

I don't know if there is a plan to make this even less work but I think 
we could probably keep the KEYS file up to date by:

    wget -O KEYS

and committing any changes.

Does anyone know more about all this though? I didn't see any mention 
about this in so I am not 
sure it is likely that new incubator projects will pick up on this.


  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message