On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Gary Martin <gary.martin@wandisco.com>wrote:
> [...]
> I wonder if we should consider being a little more specific and call the
> version 1.0-bhN where N is indicative of the number of versions of
> bloodhound with additional changes the trac branch has been through, or
> something like that.
>
Some scheme to track patches on the Trac branch seems valuable,
particularly if we get more than a few patches and have to manage temporary
patches to our Trac branch which will eventually be backed out when those
changes work their way back to the Trac core.
|