From bloodhound-dev-return-1553-apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Thu Jan 10 09:21:45 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D6870E395 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:21:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91999 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2013 09:21:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 91919 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2013 09:21:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact bloodhound-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 91789 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2013 09:21:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:21:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gary.martin@wandisco.com designates 209.85.215.51 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.51] (HELO mail-la0-f51.google.com) (209.85.215.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:21:35 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f51.google.com with SMTP id fj20so312186lab.38 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 01:21:13 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=J3oE+KLbMYNfgWQDrluoncvHI1YS6kKL4NtNJcIzRwQ=; b=KFOQKgTSuK29M5PQNI61pLTXcHexcPVGasX56DpSSpPbkWw+cMOZDFZcs9j0yNuz/6 Xysx54L8bGknzdsDHym9o9XVNNhiObc7hUo5FNheB/OJcQIDnnL+F/0Pm9CWcaKsMB2i J65PZ0i4n/6AbBc4N5uxEETauU9M58qgT+gpbd3jTAj+qe2s1Xyq2gWHjizJB652b4YJ EpvXzCj9UBeC6NH3bqjcJiTvFYKs1BX+7cc0/rGCb/Ono/LmSplUJNQz3/KSYCQ7go9j /J9NfY1RyA/4WL3J4tJw8CVih584wf0cFTk57ZhE3t31q4CvQbGF5S6RgvImQ54LyUl1 cw/A== X-Received: by 10.152.145.37 with SMTP id sr5mr11085400lab.33.1357809673647; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 01:21:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.2.5.205] ([77.86.30.139]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id sv4sm360303lab.0.2013.01.10.01.21.12 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Jan 2013 01:21:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50EE8806.9060503@wandisco.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:21:10 +0000 From: Gary Martin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Access to issue tracker (Was: Re: Relaxing access control to the Bloodhound source) References: <50EB38BA.5070408@wandisco.com> <50ED779E.9050105@wandisco.com> <50ED9BA7.4010405@wandisco.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020602070101080001000404" X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnvQHrSNgBD8Rfl4XrYPQ5iE8L4yAHl0X6kofmagvSQUz9mLTabsPoDd9WcFZLDhaSFiKvH X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --------------020602070101080001000404 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I think that we should be attempting to roughly replicate the permissions for users of the rest of issues.apache.org. On jira, the introduction currently states: Anyone is free to find issues. You must register and login if you want to create, comment, vote, or watch issues. Only developers can edit, prioritize, schedule and resolve issues. If we take developers to mean apache committers, strict adherence to that could result in a downgrade of some existing accounts but the restriction does not seem completely unreasonable. Cheers, Gary On 10/01/13 09:06, Peter Koz(elj wrote: > That is a good idea. The question is what permissions should be granted? > They should probably at least have right to post comments and put issues in > review state. > > Peter > > On 9 January 2013 17:32, Gary Martin wrote: > >> Given the aim of removing technical barriers to contributions from apache >> committers, I was wondering if we could also do something to lower the >> barriers for committers to our issue tracker. >> >> I am not yet sure what is currently technically possible between >> Bloodhound and infrastructure, but it strikes me that it would be nice to >> be able to either automatically allow committers to have access or to have >> common authentication with the rest of issues.apache.org. >> >> Obviously we would need to make sure that the existing non-apache >> committers can continue to contribute and I suspect that we would also >> continue to look after permissions. >> >> Any thoughts? >> >> Cheers, >> Gary --------------020602070101080001000404--