From bloodhound-dev-return-1525-apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Tue Jan 8 08:08:16 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF7C4E8BE for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 08:08:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1717 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2013 08:08:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 1571 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2013 08:08:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact bloodhound-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 1546 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jan 2013 08:08:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 08:08:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of olemis@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.174] (HELO mail-ie0-f174.google.com) (209.85.223.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 08:08:09 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f174.google.com with SMTP id c11so145865ieb.5 for ; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 00:07:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=jd3vqJkBPVb/smWbYFZadWnH+QV/VaqAD7z/jCYeteM=; b=pGd0tFDFjx2y1gaI/ofqUKtfOyTNarwVJrTwqEU/QNODy9gZaOnK19B8k+cdLNmHWX sGZqXqxKiSfHWLGLrPVJzUdwtFPg4T30TWFnx51pw+Z6kRmxhQZGcFV+OtPl6wALKo2K UMK4d50eWZ8pcKExzIPnEjX472TaG72upu4HaPs8cMEKCe0u43+cIUiuZOyu04rtjFTc uNK0UOk6dF/dNecl25KaBppCFZFfuz+NZa2sARx3K5ut9WklIFm2DbXmmNgaLcwJDdDc GOZogEzrOoR6qmMGiqwhb7v3ccj0djHhcDfpQT7XHYEM6R6ekDVPY0MygIFWbzqMLmN1 VL/w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.46.161 with SMTP id w1mr7815888igm.40.1357632468644; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 00:07:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.1.44 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 00:07:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50D42A23.20005@digiverse.si> References: <055.55b84508f6fcc1a8cc545a03456faa21@incubator.apache.org> <070.15b8ebe71bafa7ae651d57d105b756d7@incubator.apache.org> <50D42A23.20005@digiverse.si> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 03:07:48 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Apache Bloodhound] #115: Product-specific settings From: Olemis Lang To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 12/21/12, Jure Zitnik wrote: > Hi Olemis, > :) > On 12/20/12 10:26 PM, Olemis Lang wrote: >> On 12/19/12, Apache Bloodhound >> wrote: >>> I'll be developing this in [https://bitbucket.org/olemis/bloodhound-mq >>> my >>> patch queue @ Bitbucket] in [https://bitbucket.org/olemis/bloodhound- >>> mq/commits/all/tip/branch(%22t115_product_env%22) branch >>> t115_product_env] >>> >> Today I have submitted new versions of these patches (in branch >> t115_product_env ) aimed at running tests for Trac environments >> against product environments . > > Great, will take a look. it's done now , so enjoy ! ;) > One observation though - I noticed that the > patches are against the trunk, yep > any chance of rebasing those patches > against the multiproduct branch (bep_0003_multiproduct)? of course . IMO they should work with no or little modifications ... especially depending on base version (common ancestor) of bep_0003_multiproduct with respect to trunk . Do you merge changes in trunk relatively often ? > Would make the > patch process much easier. I think recent changes in trunk should be merged with bep_0003_multiproduct branch . You'll have to do so in the end I guess , and there will be some important enhancements for DB models , #333 , etc ... This is what I'll do , I'll create a new branch @ the aforementioned patch queue repository to perform such rebase *if* that's the way to go . >> Important observations : >> >> - Global environment's config object is reused for the moment. >> #115 is exactly about adding product-specific settings so I'll >> move forward that way . This is all wrong . I discarded environment inheritance by default to make Configuration objects more compatible with Trac's >> - NotImplementedError raised for DB methods . [...] > > ;) > jftr , this is still true . >> - Product environment will not participate in environment >> setup / upgrade >> [...] this is still the case , now documented in BEP 3 . >> Many enhancements and tests needed . Consider this an early preview >> with some initial testing code in place ;) > > If there's something I can help you with (re #115) just let me know, I > can pick that up after getting the SQL proxy integrated. > now it's done ! ;) so it is the other way round . What's the next step for multi-product support ? What shall I do ? I'll check related open tickets too ... later today . -- Regards, Olemis. Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article: