bloodhound-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com>
Subject Re: 0.6 and 1.0 releases
Date Wed, 08 May 2013 18:11:54 GMT
On 08.05.2013 06:49, Olemis Lang wrote:
> On 5/7/13, Branko Čibej <brane@wandisco.com> wrote:
>> On 07.05.2013 20:22, Olemis Lang wrote:
>>> Sorry I missed this message ...
>>>
>>> On 5/7/13, Peter Koželj <peter@digiverse.si> wrote:
>>>> Agree, at the minimum we need to get ticket relations working which are
>>>> at
>>>> least two weeks away. We need at least one 0.x release with working
>>>> relations before proceeding to 1.0.
>>>>
>>> IMO , the fact that we are distributing changes that make the new core
>>> and BH plugins substantially different from what we've been releasing
>>> until now has significant relevance as compared to the fact that some
>>> features have to be improved in BH relations , core and other plugins
>>> . The next version will not be an straightforward continuation of
>>> previous work but a major DB, and API upgrade . The version number
>>> (i.e. 1.0) will make that fact obvious to users whereas alpha , beta ,
>>> rc , ... will highlight that we are still working towards 1.0-stable
>>> and are looking for further feedback , especially concerning plugin
>>> compatibility after MP upgrades .
>> How long do you propose to publish release candidates that are not
>> actually release candidates because we know functional changes are still
>> on the drawing board?
>>
> What are the functional changes ? BH relations ? If so , the way I see
> it using all plugins except that one will result in a working system .

 But so will using plain vanilla Trac. What's your point?

-- Brane

-- 
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com


Mime
View raw message