buildr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Assaf Arkin" <ar...@intalio.com>
Subject Re: suggestion for new feature: db migrations
Date Thu, 11 Sep 2008 03:29:56 GMT
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Shane Witbeck
<shane@digitalsanctum.com> wrote:
> My answer to these types of questions is always to let the user decide or in
> this case let them develop the addons. When I first proposed this I was
> actually just thinking about a SQL-only solution.

So what should Buildr role be?  Provide one default set of migration
tasks?  Specify how the tasks are used, but not implement any?

Assaf

>
> -Shane
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 6:56 AM, Shane Witbeck <shane@digitalsanctum.com>
>> wrote:
>> > DB migrations as part of the build/deploy process via Buildr:
>> >
>> > http://code.google.com/p/c5-db-migration/
>> >
>> > What do you think?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> It sounds to me like all migration solutions are nearly the same when
>> you're changing schemas around.  But then you need to populate a
>> table, generate fake data, or shift data around, and now it's a
>> question of how to run non-SQL code and which language and ORM you
>> favor.
>>
>> Do we want to pick, or just have people develop different addons?
>>
>> Assaf
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > -Shane
>> >
>>
>

Mime
View raw message