buildr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rhett Sutphin <rh...@detailedbalance.net>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.1 release
Date Fri, 02 Jul 2010 18:14:13 GMT
Hi Antoine,

On Jul 2, 2010, at 12:35 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote:

> Thanks Daniel.
> 
> Yes, Alex said we should a maintenance release in a couple of weeks after
> 1.4.
> 
> I would also like to start delivering releases on time!
> 
> Rhett, thanks for finding out that problem. I will apply your approach for
> 1.4.2. I suggest we vote this release and I'll just bump the version when I
> run the release task. Sorry for that oversight.

Sounds good.  A non-binding +1 from me, then.

Rhett


> 
> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 09:51, Daniel Spiewak <djspiewak@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Alrighty then.  I'm generally in favor of rapid releases myself, I just
>> wanted to be sure that we weren't rushing things.
>> 
>> I vote +1 on the release.  Oh and Antoine, don't think your hard work on
>> this release has gone unnoticed.  I saw all of that JIRA and SVN activity!
>> 
>> Daniel
>> 
>> On Jul 2, 2010, at 11:47 AM, "Rhett Sutphin" <rhett@detailedbalance.net>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>> 
>>> On Jul 2, 2010, at 9:32 AM, Daniel Spiewak wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Doesn't it seem just a little quick to be pushing out 1.4.1?  I don't
>> object
>>>> too strenuously, but it just seems a bit weird.
>>> 
>>> I'm in favor of it.  Frequent releases let the project adapt to changing
>> circumstances and fix critical bugs before they scare off potential new
>> adopters.  Many successful projects have frequent releases -- one I can
>> think of in particular is hudson, which has a release every week.
>>> 
>>> So long as the changes are well documented and there's a good (passing)
>> test suite (both of which are the case with buildr), there's no need for
>> months to elapse between releases.
>>> 
>>> Rhett
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Daniel
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Antoine Toulme <antoine@lunar-ocean.com
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> We're voting on the source distributions available here:
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/<
>> http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/>
>>>>> 
>>>>> Specifically:
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/buildr-1.4.1.tgz<
>> http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/buildr-1.4.1.tgz>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/buildr-1.4.1.zip<
>> http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/buildr-1.4.1.zip>
>>>>> 
>>>>> The documentation generated for this release is available here:
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/<
>> http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/buildr.pdf<
>> http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/buildr.pdf>
>>>>> 
>>>>> The official specification against which this release was tested:
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/specs.html<
>> http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/specs.html>
>>>>> 
>>>>> Test coverage report:
>>>>> 
>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/coverage/index.html<
>> http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/coverage/index.html
>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> The following changes were made since 1.4.0:
>>>>> 
>>>>> * Added:  BUILDR-420 Support external compiler
>>>>> * Added:  BUILDR-425 Specify dev dependencies in .gemspec
>>>>> * Change: BUILDR-459 Update gemspec to accept json_pure ~> 1.4.3
>>>>> * Fixed:  BUILDR-455 cc_spec.rb l 160 depends on time and thus fails
>>>>> intermittently
>>>>> * Fixed:  BUILDR-461 Packages with different ids collide
>>>>> * Fixed:  BUILDR-439 "The command line is too long" when running TestNG
>>>>> tests
>>>>> * Fixed:  BUILDR-463 Setting a system property in the buildfile causes
>> a
>>>>> NoClassDefFoundError
>>>>> 
>>>>> This vote is opened for 72h!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Antoine
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> 


Mime
View raw message