buildr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Antoine Toulme <anto...@lunar-ocean.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.1 release
Date Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:23:45 GMT
We have 3 binding +1s, 0 +0s, 0 -1s.

We have 1 non-binding +1.

Since the 4th of July weekend impacted this vote, let's keep it open till
tomorrow morning so that more testing can be done on it.

I will close the vote then.

Thanks all for your participation!

Antoine

On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 08:58, Alex Boisvert <alex.boisvert@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 for the release; though I won't be able to test it until Tuesday.
>
> The rationale for such quick release is to resolve an install issue
> with json-pure dependency.  And we agreed to handle install issues
> more promptly than in the past.
>
> alex
>
> On Friday, July 2, 2010, Rhett Sutphin <rhett@detailedbalance.net> wrote:
> > Hi Antoine,
> >
> > On Jul 2, 2010, at 12:35 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks Daniel.
> >>
> >> Yes, Alex said we should a maintenance release in a couple of weeks
> after
> >> 1.4.
> >>
> >> I would also like to start delivering releases on time!
> >>
> >> Rhett, thanks for finding out that problem. I will apply your approach
> for
> >> 1.4.2. I suggest we vote this release and I'll just bump the version
> when I
> >> run the release task. Sorry for that oversight.
> >
> > Sounds good.  A non-binding +1 from me, then.
> >
> > Rhett
> >
> >
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 09:51, Daniel Spiewak <djspiewak@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Alrighty then.  I'm generally in favor of rapid releases myself, I just
> >>> wanted to be sure that we weren't rushing things.
> >>>
> >>> I vote +1 on the release.  Oh and Antoine, don't think your hard work
> on
> >>> this release has gone unnoticed.  I saw all of that JIRA and SVN
> activity!
> >>>
> >>> Daniel
> >>>
> >>> On Jul 2, 2010, at 11:47 AM, "Rhett Sutphin" <
> rhett@detailedbalance.net>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Daniel,
> >>>>
> >>>> On Jul 2, 2010, at 9:32 AM, Daniel Spiewak wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Doesn't it seem just a little quick to be pushing out 1.4.1?  I
don't
> >>> object
> >>>>> too strenuously, but it just seems a bit weird.
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm in favor of it.  Frequent releases let the project adapt to
> changing
> >>> circumstances and fix critical bugs before they scare off potential new
> >>> adopters.  Many successful projects have frequent releases -- one I can
> >>> think of in particular is hudson, which has a release every week.
> >>>>
> >>>> So long as the changes are well documented and there's a good
> (passing)
> >>> test suite (both of which are the case with buildr), there's no need
> for
> >>> months to elapse between releases.
> >>>>
> >>>> Rhett
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Daniel
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Antoine Toulme <
> antoine@lunar-ocean.com
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> We're voting on the source distributions available here:
> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/<
> >>> http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Specifically:
> >>>>>>
> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/buildr-1.4.1.tgz<
> >>>
> http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/buildr-1.4.1.tgz>
> >>>>>>
> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/buildr-1.4.1.zip<
> >>>
> http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/buildr-1.4.1.zip>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The documentation generated for this release is available here:
> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/<
> >>> http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/>
> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/buildr.pdf<
> >>> http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/buildr.pdf>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The official specification against which this release was tested:
> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/specs.html<
> >>> http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/specs.html>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Test coverage report:
> >>>>>>
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~ <
> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/coverage/index.html>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message