buildr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Boisvert <alex.boisv...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.1 release
Date Sun, 04 Jul 2010 15:58:17 GMT
+1 for the release; though I won't be able to test it until Tuesday.

The rationale for such quick release is to resolve an install issue
with json-pure dependency.  And we agreed to handle install issues
more promptly than in the past.

alex

On Friday, July 2, 2010, Rhett Sutphin <rhett@detailedbalance.net> wrote:
> Hi Antoine,
>
> On Jul 2, 2010, at 12:35 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
>
>> Thanks Daniel.
>>
>> Yes, Alex said we should a maintenance release in a couple of weeks after
>> 1.4.
>>
>> I would also like to start delivering releases on time!
>>
>> Rhett, thanks for finding out that problem. I will apply your approach for
>> 1.4.2. I suggest we vote this release and I'll just bump the version when I
>> run the release task. Sorry for that oversight.
>
> Sounds good.  A non-binding +1 from me, then.
>
> Rhett
>
>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 09:51, Daniel Spiewak <djspiewak@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Alrighty then.  I'm generally in favor of rapid releases myself, I just
>>> wanted to be sure that we weren't rushing things.
>>>
>>> I vote +1 on the release.  Oh and Antoine, don't think your hard work on
>>> this release has gone unnoticed.  I saw all of that JIRA and SVN activity!
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>> On Jul 2, 2010, at 11:47 AM, "Rhett Sutphin" <rhett@detailedbalance.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 2, 2010, at 9:32 AM, Daniel Spiewak wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Doesn't it seem just a little quick to be pushing out 1.4.1?  I don't
>>> object
>>>>> too strenuously, but it just seems a bit weird.
>>>>
>>>> I'm in favor of it.  Frequent releases let the project adapt to changing
>>> circumstances and fix critical bugs before they scare off potential new
>>> adopters.  Many successful projects have frequent releases -- one I can
>>> think of in particular is hudson, which has a release every week.
>>>>
>>>> So long as the changes are well documented and there's a good (passing)
>>> test suite (both of which are the case with buildr), there's no need for
>>> months to elapse between releases.
>>>>
>>>> Rhett
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Antoine Toulme <antoine@lunar-ocean.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> We're voting on the source distributions available here:
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/<
>>> http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Specifically:
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/buildr-1.4.1.tgz<
>>> http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/buildr-1.4.1.tgz>
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/buildr-1.4.1.zip<
>>> http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/buildr-1.4.1.zip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The documentation generated for this release is available here:
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/<
>>> http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/>
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/buildr.pdf<
>>> http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/buildr.pdf>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The official specification against which this release was tested:
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/specs.html<
>>> http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/specs.html>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Test coverage report:
>>>>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ <http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/coverage/index.html>

Mime
View raw message