buildr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Antoine Toulme <anto...@lunar-ocean.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.1 release
Date Wed, 07 Jul 2010 15:33:03 GMT
The vote is closed. Thanks all! We have a new release!

On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:23, Antoine Toulme <antoine@lunar-ocean.com>wrote:

> We have 3 binding +1s, 0 +0s, 0 -1s.
>
> We have 1 non-binding +1.
>
> Since the 4th of July weekend impacted this vote, let's keep it open till
> tomorrow morning so that more testing can be done on it.
>
> I will close the vote then.
>
> Thanks all for your participation!
>
> Antoine
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 08:58, Alex Boisvert <alex.boisvert@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> +1 for the release; though I won't be able to test it until Tuesday.
>>
>> The rationale for such quick release is to resolve an install issue
>> with json-pure dependency.  And we agreed to handle install issues
>> more promptly than in the past.
>>
>> alex
>>
>> On Friday, July 2, 2010, Rhett Sutphin <rhett@detailedbalance.net> wrote:
>> > Hi Antoine,
>> >
>> > On Jul 2, 2010, at 12:35 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
>> >
>> >> Thanks Daniel.
>> >>
>> >> Yes, Alex said we should a maintenance release in a couple of weeks
>> after
>> >> 1.4.
>> >>
>> >> I would also like to start delivering releases on time!
>> >>
>> >> Rhett, thanks for finding out that problem. I will apply your approach
>> for
>> >> 1.4.2. I suggest we vote this release and I'll just bump the version
>> when I
>> >> run the release task. Sorry for that oversight.
>> >
>> > Sounds good.  A non-binding +1 from me, then.
>> >
>> > Rhett
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 09:51, Daniel Spiewak <djspiewak@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Alrighty then.  I'm generally in favor of rapid releases myself, I
>> just
>> >>> wanted to be sure that we weren't rushing things.
>> >>>
>> >>> I vote +1 on the release.  Oh and Antoine, don't think your hard work
>> on
>> >>> this release has gone unnoticed.  I saw all of that JIRA and SVN
>> activity!
>> >>>
>> >>> Daniel
>> >>>
>> >>> On Jul 2, 2010, at 11:47 AM, "Rhett Sutphin" <
>> rhett@detailedbalance.net>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Hi Daniel,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Jul 2, 2010, at 9:32 AM, Daniel Spiewak wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Doesn't it seem just a little quick to be pushing out 1.4.1?
 I
>> don't
>> >>> object
>> >>>>> too strenuously, but it just seems a bit weird.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I'm in favor of it.  Frequent releases let the project adapt to
>> changing
>> >>> circumstances and fix critical bugs before they scare off potential
>> new
>> >>> adopters.  Many successful projects have frequent releases -- one I
>> can
>> >>> think of in particular is hudson, which has a release every week.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> So long as the changes are well documented and there's a good
>> (passing)
>> >>> test suite (both of which are the case with buildr), there's no need
>> for
>> >>> months to elapse between releases.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Rhett
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Daniel
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Antoine Toulme <
>> antoine@lunar-ocean.com
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> We're voting on the source distributions available here:
>> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/<
>> >>> http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Specifically:
>> >>>>>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/buildr-1.4.1.tgz<
>> >>>
>> http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/buildr-1.4.1.tgz>
>> >>>>>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/buildr-1.4.1.zip<
>> >>>
>> http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/buildr-1.4.1.zip>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> The documentation generated for this release is available
here:
>> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/<
>> >>> http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/>
>> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/buildr.pdf<
>> >>> http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/buildr.pdf>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> The official specification against which this release was
tested:
>> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/specs.html<
>> >>> http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/specs.html>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Test coverage report:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~ <
>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/coverage/index.html>
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message