buildr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Antoine Toulme <anto...@lunar-ocean.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.6 release
Date Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:38:11 GMT
+1. I ran a few integration tests with the release and everything checks
out.

2011/6/23 Marc-André Laverdière <marcandre.laverdiere@gmail.com>

> I agree. This is not a blocker.
> Thanks for looking into it.
>
> Marc-André LAVERDIÈRE
> "Perseverance must finish its work so that you may be mature and complete,
> not lacking anything." -James 1:4
> http://asimplediscipleslife.blogspot.com/
> mlaverd.theunixplace.com
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Alex Boisvert <alex.boisvert@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Alex Boisvert <alex.boisvert@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> 2011/6/22 Marc-André Laverdière <marcandre.laverdiere@gmail.com>
> >>
> >>> That part worked well. Thanks!
> >>>
> >>> But I got something that didn't :(
> >>>
> >>> The auto-versioning after a release messed up:
> >>> 1.2-RC-5-SNAPSHOT -> 1.2-RC-5 -> 1.000003-SNAPSHOT
> >>>
> >>
> >> Did this use to work in previous versions?
> >>
> >> The release documentation (http://buildr.apache.org/releasing.html) is
> >> pretty clear that it will "increment the last digit of the 3-digit
> version
> >> number if THIS_VERSION ends with -SNAPSHOT."   And you have several
> >> alternatives to specify the next version number.
> >>
> >> Unless this used to work, I don't see this bug as a blocker for the
> >> release.  We can address it for the next version.
> >>
> >
> > I just tested w/ 1.4.4 and 1.4.5 and got the same result.  So I'm going
> to
> > go ahead with the release given that the bug seems to have existed for
> some
> > time and there are straightforward workarounds.
> >
> > alex
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message