buildr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Boisvert <alex.boisv...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Improved integration between Apache and GitHub
Date Fri, 14 Feb 2014 18:46:32 GMT
Hi Jim,

Not sure what you mean exactly.  Of course there's a difference between git
and GitHub... but we're talking specifically about GitHub integration.  See
the article linked on the original post:
https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/improved_integration_between_apache_and

I'm +1 for the integration too.

alex



On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 6:34 AM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com> wrote:

> git != Gitub. ie: moving to git is not the same as
> using Github.
> On Feb 13, 2014, at 12:34 PM, Antoine Toulme <antoine@lunar-ocean.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I would be delighted if we move to git and open ourselves to a wider
> > audience of developers. You have my vote of course.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Peter Donald <peter@realityforge.org
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> The infrastructure team just announced [1] that they now support
> >> improved integration with GitHub. In a nutshell this means
> >>
> >> "
> >> * Any Pull Request that gets opened, closed, reopened or commented on
> >> now gets recorded on the project's mailing list
> >> * If a project has a JIRA instance, any PRs or comments on PRs that
> >> include a JIRA ticket ID will trigger an update on that specific
> >> ticket
> >> * Replying to a GitHub comment on the dev@ mailing list will trigger a
> >> comment being placed on GitHub (yes, it works both ways!)
> >> "
> >>
> >> If there is no objections I would like to see it turned on for Buildr.
> >>
> >> [1]
> >>
> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/improved_integration_between_apache_and
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Peter Donald
> >>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message