buildr-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alex Boisvert" <boisv...@intalio.com>
Subject Re: Interactive Shell Support
Date Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:07:05 GMT
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Daniel Spiewak <djspiewak@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Yes, but I only have to do it once when I write the buildfile. All the
> > times I run the shell, I don't have to cd into a specific directory,
> > or remember the qualified task name. So if you don't need different
> > shells for different projects (in the same build), overall there's
> > much less effort setting it up this way.
>

The same could be said for the other approach.  You could easily have,

task 'shell' => 'myproject:shell:jirb'

in your project and be done with it.


> Oh, on a syntactic note, Lispers would know the "shell" much better as a
> REPL.  What's the preferred terminology?  I like shell because it's short
> and relatively easy to understand, but maybe I'm the minority.  If someone
> is expecting the interactive language shell to be called a "REPL", then
> they
> would probably expect `buildr shell` to be some sort of interactive command
> interface to Buildr itself (allowing you to run tasks).  Does this seem
> like
> a potential problem or should we not fret over it?


I think "shell" is the more common and broader name.   And as shown above,
it's easy to create an alias if you insist on a specific name.

alex

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message