buildr-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alexis Midon <alexismi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: is buildr still active?
Date Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:42:23 GMT
this sounds like a cheap shot:
http://github.com/assaf/buildr/blob/23ead9b569b373e659788fdaef2fdfb95029095b/CHANGELOG

Alexis


On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Ittay Dror <ittayd@tikalk.com> wrote:

>
>
> Assaf Arkin wrote:
>
>  Specs really really help. A patch could look simple and trivial, maybe
>> it's
>> a one line fix, but writing the spec and then accepting the patch is more
>> work than accepting a tested patch.
>>
>> If you can't figure out how to fix something, but can at least write a
>> spec
>> to prove it's broken, that's also enormously helpful. The fix may end up
>> to
>> be trivial to someone else, just by running the spec and looking at the
>> stack trace.
>>
>> So spec as much as possible.
>>
>>
> I find the current way of submitting patches / specs to be unproductive.
> It's hard for people to comment on a patch: you see an email about a patch,
> need to open the issue in the browser, download the patch, read, and then
> the only way to comment is writing an out-of-line comment in jira. and of
> course people follow jira notices far less than the "regular" mailing lists.
>  Also, there are no clear coding conventions to follow. Finally, I don't
> remember seeing someone's patch being accepted.
>
> Ittay
>
>> Assaf
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Ittay
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Tikal <http://www.tikalk.com>
> Tikal Project <http://tikal.sourceforge.net>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message