buildr-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Spiewak <djspie...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Scala 2.7.1 as default?
Date Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:29:59 GMT
git://github.com/djspiewak/buildr.git / separate-scala-specs

Specs: 1.4.3
ScalaCheck: 1.5

git://github.com/djspiewak/buildr.git / master

""
""
ScalaTest: 0.9.4

The ScalaTest version increment is untested with Buildr, but the other two
are working fine (and have been for a while).

Daniel

On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Daniel Spiewak <djspiewak@gmail.com> wrote:

> I don't know anything about ScalaTest, but Specs and ScalaCheck are both
> updated within my Git fork.  http://github.com/djspiewak/buildr
>
> Daniel
>
>
> On Feb 15, 2009, at 11:40 PM, Alex Boisvert <boisvert@intalio.com> wrote:
>
>  (Resending... forgot the "s" in users@buildr.apache.org)
>>
>> Buildr currently assumes Scala 2.7.1 as default by its choice of test
>> libraries (scala-specs 1.2.9, scalatest 0.9.3 and scalacheck 1.3) which
>> are
>> binary-incompatible with newer versions of Scala.
>>
>> Would anyone object to upgrading these libraries to the latest currently
>> available?   I understand we want to maintain backward compatibility in
>> Buildr but if no one is still using Scala 2.7.1 then I don't think it
>> makes
>> much sense to do so.
>>
>> Perhaps it would make more sense to have no library defaults until things
>> have stabilized?  (i.e., require users to specify versions in build.yaml)
>>
>> alex
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message