buildr-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Boisvert <boisv...@intalio.com>
Subject Re: Buildr 1.3.4 Released
Date Thu, 30 Apr 2009 05:04:55 GMT
Yes, although the support is still rather basic.   transitive() doesn't
support version ranges, coalescing versions (e.g. log4j-1.2.14 and 1.2.15),
proximity or priority, etc.

Also, I think Peter was asking whether Buildr publishes Maven poms that
include dependency information.

alex

On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Daniel Spiewak <djspiewak@gmail.com> wrote:

> Maybe I'm missing something, but doesn't Buildr already support transitive
> dependencies?
>
> define 'my-project' do
>  compile.with transitive('org.apache.wicket:wicket:jar:1.4')
> end
>
> Daniel
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Alex Boisvert <boisvert@intalio.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:16 PM, peter schröder <ps@blau.de> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Alex,
> > >
> > > i joined the list in April and looked at the last Posts in the Mailing
> > > list, wich were quite old.
> > > The same impression on the http://groups.google.com/group/buildr-talk .
> >
> >
> > The buildr-task mailing list was used before we moved into the Apache
> > incubator so it hasn't been used in a long while.
> >
> >
> > > But i am quit happy that its not the case! I appreciate the work on
> > buildr
> > > and i like the style of webseite and especially the pdf-version of the
> > > quide! I think its one of the best reads from a apache project i ever
> > had!
> >
> >
> > Great to hear!  Assaf must be credited for much of the documentation and
> > doc
> > infrastructre.  I like the result too.  It's easy for developers to write
> > doc and it produces great output.
> >
> > On the google-groups i found an (old) discussion about a plugin that
> > > generates a maven pom with dependencies for an artifact. Is that
> > something
> > > that is coming a future release of buildr?
> >
> >
> >  Yes, that's the plan.
> >
> > We are currently evaluating buildr combined with ivy for
> > > dependency-mechanism, but a built-in maven dependency-support would be
> > even
> > > nicer!
> >
> >
> > We're planning dependency management for Buildr 1.4.x.  No actual work
> has
> > started yet but ideas have been circulated.    We definitely plan to
> > support
> > reading Maven2 poms for transitive dependencies.  Using Ivy is a
> > possibility.  Do you want to look into that?
> >
> > alex
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message