buildr-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Boisvert <alex.boisv...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Debian packaging contribution
Date Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:51:02 GMT
I would keep it as 3rd-party extension for now.  Give it time to mature and
bring it in later if committers are ready to support + maintain it.

alex


On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Daniel Spiewak <djspiewak@gmail.com> wrote:

> Just to get the discussion started, I'm in favor of the third party
> extension approach, but we could easily pull it in as an addon/ or even
> lib/
> if there's enough serious interest.
>
> Daniel
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 4:08 AM, Antoine Toulme <antoine@lunar-ocean.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > at Intalio, we wrote a debian packaging extension. We'd like to
> contribute
> > to Buildr and I opened
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-318for
> > this.
> >
> > I was asked by Daniel to open a thread on this ml to discuss where this
> > contribution should go to:
> > -third party extension as it is now ?
> > -an addon ?
> > -or something part of lib ? (we have enough specs to qualify for it).
> >
> > Note that as of now you can take advantage of the code by forking:
> >
> > http://github.com/intalio/package_as_deb
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Antoine
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message