buildr-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Antoine Toulme <anto...@lunar-ocean.com>
Subject Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Date Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:33:31 GMT
Will, the problem with the gem versions are something you need to fix on
your machine, I think.

How did you install Buildr ? Using the gem command ?

On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:29, Will Rogers <wjrogers@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Antoine Toulme <antoine@lunar-ocean.com>
> wrote:
> > I pushed RC3 which fixes this bug. I will start a vote for this RC3 to be
> > our GA now.
> > http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC3/
>
> Thanks. Sorry I didn't file a bug; I hadn't gotten around to resetting
> my issues.apache.org password after the break-in they had earlier this
> month.
>
> I ran buildr's tests w/ RC3 and got 52 failures on my Win7 install of
> ruby 1.8.7 (2010-01-10 patchlevel 249) [i386-mingw32]. Here's the
> output:
>
>  http://dl.dropbox.com/u/26070/specs_buildr_1.4.0rc3.html.gz
>
> Many of the problems appear to be Windows path issues (especially the
> URI specs). There are some failures under "Buildr::Application gems"
> that look like more fixable gem version mismatch problems, though,
> e.g.:
>
> "should return one entry for each gem specified in buildr.yaml
> can't activate rspec (= 1.3.0, runtime) for [], already activated
> rspec-1.2.9 for []"
>
> ...and it looks like calling File.utime throws a Permission denied
> error every time.
>
>
> On the upside, looks like you fixed the problems with not repackaging
> when some files are changed, so thanks!
>
> -- Will
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message