buildr-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Antoine Toulme <anto...@lunar-ocean.com>
Subject Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out
Date Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:34:13 GMT
Also, can you please open a bug with the output of the testing you made ?

Thanks,

Antoine

On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:33, Antoine Toulme <antoine@lunar-ocean.com>wrote:

> Will, the problem with the gem versions are something you need to fix on
> your machine, I think.
>
> How did you install Buildr ? Using the gem command ?
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:29, Will Rogers <wjrogers@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Antoine Toulme <antoine@lunar-ocean.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I pushed RC3 which fixes this bug. I will start a vote for this RC3 to
>> be
>> > our GA now.
>> > http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.0RC3/
>>
>> Thanks. Sorry I didn't file a bug; I hadn't gotten around to resetting
>> my issues.apache.org password after the break-in they had earlier this
>> month.
>>
>> I ran buildr's tests w/ RC3 and got 52 failures on my Win7 install of
>> ruby 1.8.7 (2010-01-10 patchlevel 249) [i386-mingw32]. Here's the
>> output:
>>
>>  http://dl.dropbox.com/u/26070/specs_buildr_1.4.0rc3.html.gz
>>
>> Many of the problems appear to be Windows path issues (especially the
>> URI specs). There are some failures under "Buildr::Application gems"
>> that look like more fixable gem version mismatch problems, though,
>> e.g.:
>>
>> "should return one entry for each gem specified in buildr.yaml
>> can't activate rspec (= 1.3.0, runtime) for [], already activated
>> rspec-1.2.9 for []"
>>
>> ...and it looks like calling File.utime throws a Permission denied
>> error every time.
>>
>>
>> On the upside, looks like you fixed the problems with not repackaging
>> when some files are changed, so thanks!
>>
>> -- Will
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message