buildr-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Antoine Toulme <anto...@lunar-ocean.com>
Subject Re: buildr 1.4 packaging problem?
Date Thu, 01 Jul 2010 16:17:50 GMT
JRuby 1.6 targets supporting 1.9. When they do we can think of moving on.

On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 08:38, Rhett Sutphin <rhett@detailedbalance.net>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Jul 1, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Alex Boisvert wrote:
>
> > Hi Kristof,
> >
> > Yes, Ruby 1.9.x compatibility is a work in progress.  Thanks for
> reporting.
> > If you feel like spending some time to fix it (it's likely to be a
> trivial
> > fix) it would be appreciated.
>
> I posted on the ticket, but I'll repeat it here since it's a curious
> problem:  it seems like the issue is that under 1.9.1, rubygems is
> activating the most recent installed version of rubyzip (0.9.4 in Kristof's
> case), not the version (0.9.1) that buildr requests.
>
> Bug #3140[1] in MRI's issue tracker seems like it is related.  I don't
> think this can be fixed in buildr.
>
> Rhett
>
> [1]: http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/3140
>
> >
> > alex
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Kristof Jozsa <kristof.jozsa@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> I just discovered buildr already has transitive dependency handling
> >> and that sounded way too cool to miss it.. Unfortunately I'd run into
> >> a packaging problem in a few minutes. I _guess_ it's a compatibility
> >> issue.. but sure you know better than me.
> >>
> >> The issue is shown here:
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-462 and it happens on
> >> arch linux x64 using ruby 1.9.1 and the latest buildr gem. If you have
> >> a quick fix or any workarounds for now, I'd be happy to try it out.
> >>
> >> thanks a lot,
> >> K
> >>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message